Table 8b. Coefficient of Variation for Weight of Inbound Commodity Flows for Selected Mode of Transportation by State of Destination: 2002

Table 8b. Coefficient of Variation for Weight of Inbound Commodity Flows for Selected Mode of Transportation by State of Destination: 2002

Excel | CSV

State of destination Total1 Truck Rail Water Air (including truck and air)
Alabama 8.6 11.7 10.9 26.2 S
Alaska 34.5 26.7 S 43.5 18.5
Arizona 13.5 17.1 12.9 S 23.6
Arkansas 10.4 11.4 14.6 S 31.6
California 8.6 12.5 30.7 40.9 32.3
Colorado 10.3 13.6 14.2 22.8
Connecticut 13.9 15.1 13.0 35.8 S
Delaware 20.6 16.2 S S 21.0
District of Columbia 20.0 15.1 S S 29.8
Florida 9.8 12.2 39.4 21.9 S
Georgia 10.2 12.3 15.2 S 25.2
Hawaii 12.3 8.4 33.9 30.6
Idaho 11.9 11.8 40.0 14.7
Illinois 14.2 17.3 18.9 21.3 17.9
Indiana 10.5 15.4 15.7 S 16.9
Iowa 9.6 10.4 17.9 S 14.7
Kansas 17.2 20.6 15.7 49.8
Kentucky 13.0 7.8 14.0 49.0 25.4
Louisiana 8.3 15.7 27.1 11.1 34.5
Maine 9.8 10.0 14.3 S 24.2
Maryland 25.7 30.6 17.4 37.3 40.7
Massachusetts 8.6 9.7 27.2 S S
Michigan 6.4 7.0 12.7 35.6 24.0
Minnesota 27.3 37.2 13.1 31.9 42.2
Mississippi 11.4 7.4 34.7 40.2 49.9
Missouri 7.7 11.8 14.2 S 46.3
Montana 19.7 11.6 S 31.0
Nebraska 11.4 12.2 14.0 S 27.8
Nevada 9.4 11.6 26.1 20.8
New Hampshire 22.5 23.9 27.9 S 29.3
New Jersey 9.7 10.4 35.4 24.8 14.9
New Mexico 15.2 19.6 28.2 S S
New York 9.0 9.3 25.7 37.0 31.3
North Carolina 9.4 9.4 16.6 S 15.8
North Dakota 7.8 13.3 46.2 S S
Ohio 5.0 5.5 18.5 21.2 27.5
Oklahoma 9.8 14.3 31.7 S 20.2
Oregon 16.1 20.7 21.3 S 21.5
Pennsylvania 4.0 7.2 13.3 23.6 20.9
Rhode Island 11.0 12.0 18.6 S 16.9
South Carolina 9.7 11.5 16.6 S S
South Dakota 18.3 14.0 38.8 S
Tennessee 8.4 11.0 14.1 S S
Texas 6.5 7.0 9.3 14.7 28.1
Utah 14.2 16.4 18.4 37.6
Vermont 16.9 17.1 30.7 S
Virginia 5.1 6.0 17.7 33.3 16.2
Washington 23.5 34.6 21.4 39.3 36.1
West Virginia 13.8 11.0 26.8 21.2 S
Wisconsin 7.0 10.1 12.4 S 23.2
Wyoming 31.0 26.5 42.5 42.8

KEY:
– Represents data cell equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality.

1 "Total" include shipments by other modes not separately listed on this table, such as pipeline and multimodal shipments such as parcel, postal and courier; truck and rail; truck and water; rail and water; other multiple combinations, and unknown modes. Hence the sum of the four modes shown here will not equal the total.

NOTES: The appendices provide information on confidentially protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
Coverage for the 2002 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) differs from the previous surveys due to a change from the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification System to the 1997 North American Industry Classification System and other survey improvements. Therefore, data users are urged to use caution when comparing 2002 CFS estimates with estimates from prior years.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual States Data, May 2005.