Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2002

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2002

[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1
2002
(million $)
Percent of total 2002
(thousands)
Percent of total 2002
(millions)
Percent of
total
All States 14,154 100.0 6,432 100.0 749 100.0
NEW ENGLAND STATES            
Connecticut 51 0.4 4 1 0.2
Maine 20 0.1 2 1 0.1
Massachusetts S S 22 0.3 10 1.3
New Hampshire 47 0.3 2 1 0.1
Rhode Island 9 S S
Vermont 6 S S S S
MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES            
New Jersey 277 2.0 S S 9 1.1
New York 352 2.5 S S S S
Pennsylvania 667 4.7 S S S S
EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Illinois 117 0.8 S S S S
Indiana 86 0.6 S S S S
Michigan 462 3.3 S S S S
Ohio 210 1.5 7 0.1 3 0.4
Wisconsin 153 1.1 S S S S
WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Iowa S S S S S S
Kansas 12 S S S S
Minnesota 98 0.7 S S S S
Missouri 92 0.6 8 0.1 8 1.1
Nebraska S S S S S S
North Dakota S S S S S S
South Dakota S S S S S S
SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES            
Delaware 15 0.1 S S S S
District of Columbia 588 4.2 S S 4 0.6
Florida 83 0.6 5 4 0.5
Georgia 79 0.6 S S S S
Maryland 3,317 23.4 3,351 52.1 100 13.3
North Carolina 330 2.3 40 0.6 13 1.8
South Carolina 157 1.1 45 0.7 21 2.8
Virginia 2,173 15.4 927 14.4 38 5.1
West Virginia 23 0.2 110 1.7 10 1.3
EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Alabama S S S S S S
Kentucky S S S S S S
Mississippi S S S S S S
Tennessee 31 0.2 S S S S
WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Arkansas S S S S S S
Louisiana 13 S S S S
Oklahoma S S S S S S
Texas 176 1.2 S S S S
MOUNTAIN STATES            
Arizona S S S S S S
Colorado S S S S S S
Idaho S S S S S S
Montana S S S S S S
Nevada S S S S S S
New Mexico S S S S S S
Utah 23 0.2 S S S S
Wyoming S S S S S S
PACIFIC STATES            
Alaska S S S S S S
California S S 55 0.8 151 20.1
Hawaii S S S S S S
Oregon S S S S S S
Washington S S S S S S

KEY:
– Represents data cell equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network. See "Mileage Calculations" section for additional information.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Appendix B tables provide estimated measures of sampling variability. The Introduction and appendixes give information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
Coverage for the 2002 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) differs from the previous surveys due to a change from the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification System to the 1997 North American Industry Classification System and other survey improvements. Therefore, data users are urged to use caution when comparing 2002 CFS estimates with estimates from prior years.

SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.