Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002

[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1
2002
(million $)
Percent of total 2002
(thousands)
Percent of total 2002
(millions)
Percent of
total
All States 13,480 100.0 23,659 100.0 S S
NEW ENGLAND STATES            
Connecticut S S S S S S
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire S S S S S S
Rhode Island S S S S S S
Vermont S S S S S S
MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES            
New Jersey 16 0.1 5 40 0.9
New York S S S S S S
Pennsylvania S S S S S S
EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Illinois 10 S S S S
Indiana S S S S S S
Michigan S S S S S S
Ohio S S S S S S
Wisconsin S S S S S S
WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Iowa S S S S S S
Kansas S S S S S S
Minnesota S S
Missouri S S S S S S
Nebraska S S S S S S
North Dakota S S S S S S
South Dakota
SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES            
Delaware S S S S S S
District of Columbia S S S S S S
Florida 17 0.1 6 42 0.9
Georgia S S S S S S
Maryland 3 S S S S
North Carolina S S S S S S
South Carolina S S S S S S
Virginia 14 0.1
West Virginia S S S S S S
EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Alabama S S S S S S
Kentucky S S S S S S
Mississippi S S S S S S
Tennessee S S S S S S
WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Arkansas S S S S S S
Louisiana S S S S S S
Oklahoma S S S S S S
Texas 15 0.1 S S S S
MOUNTAIN STATES            
Arizona 5 S S S S
Colorado 1
Idaho S S S S S S
Montana
Nevada 8 S S S S
New Mexico S S S S S S
Utah S S S S S S
Wyoming S S S S S S
PACIFIC STATES            
Alaska S S S S S S
California 340 2.5 S S S S
Hawaii 12,798 94.9 22,440 94.8 957 20.8
Oregon 10 S S S S
Washington 49 0.4 S S S S

KEY:
– Represents data cell equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network. See "Mileage Calculations" section for additional information.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Appendix B tables provide estimated measures of sampling variability. The Introduction and appendixes give information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
Coverage for the 2002 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) differs from the previous surveys due to a change from the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification System to the 1997 North American Industry Classification System and other survey improvements. Therefore, data users are urged to use caution when comparing 2002 CFS estimates with estimates from prior years.

SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.