Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2002

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2002

[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1
2002
(million $)
Percent of total 2002
(thousands)
Percent of total 2002
(millions)
Percent of
total
All States 20,963 100.0 24,995 100.0 8,710 100.0
NEW ENGLAND STATES            
Connecticut 20 1 3
Maine S S S S S S
Massachusetts S S S S S S
New Hampshire S S S S S S
Rhode Island S S S S S S
Vermont S S S S S S
MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES            
New Jersey S S S S S S
New York S S 2 9 0.1
Pennsylvania S S 4 21 0.2
EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Illinois 180 0.9 17 S S
Indiana 27 0.1 2 9 0.1
Michigan 42 0.2 7 53 0.6
Ohio 115 0.5 S S S S
Wisconsin S S S S S S
WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Iowa S S S S S S
Kansas 21 0.1 S S S S
Minnesota S S S S S S
Missouri 388 1.9 41 0.2 196 2.2
Nebraska 2 1
North Dakota S S S S S S
South Dakota S S S S S S
SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES            
Delaware S S S S S S
District of Columbia S S S S S S
Florida 161 0.8 S S S S
Georgia S S 14 84 1.0
Maryland S S S S S S
North Carolina 35 0.2 1 7
South Carolina S S S S S S
Virginia S S S S S S
West Virginia S S S S S S
EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Alabama 31 0.1 S S S S
Kentucky 53 0.3 S S S S
Mississippi S S S S S S
Tennessee S S S S S S
WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Arkansas S S S S S S
Louisiana S S S S S S
Oklahoma S S S S S S
Texas 232 1.1 S S S S
MOUNTAIN STATES            
Arizona 45 0.2 S S S S
Colorado 68 0.3 S S S S
Idaho S S S S S S
Montana S S S S S S
Nevada 187 0.9 15 43 0.5
New Mexico S S S S S S
Utah 48 0.2 10 31 0.4
Wyoming S S S S S S
PACIFIC STATES            
Alaska S S S S S S
California 3,264 15.6 S S S S
Hawaii 12,798 61.1 22,440 89.8 957 11.0
Oregon 365 1.7 S S S S
Washington 310 1.5 411 1.6 1,196 13.7

KEY:
– Represents data cell equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network. See "Mileage Calculations" section for additional information.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Appendix B tables provide estimated measures of sampling variability. The Introduction and appendixes give information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
Coverage for the 2002 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) differs from the previous surveys due to a change from the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification System to the 1997 North American Industry Classification System and other survey improvements. Therefore, data users are urged to use caution when comparing 2002 CFS estimates with estimates from prior years.

SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.