Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2002

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2002

[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1
2002
(million $)
Percent of total 2002
(thousands)
Percent of total 2002
(millions)
Percent of
total
All States 17,751 100.0 16,466 100.0 2,513 100.0
NEW ENGLAND STATES            
Connecticut 553 3.1 133 0.8 27 1.1
Maine 534 3.0 538 3.3 108 4.3
Massachusetts 4,305 24.3 810 4.9 116 4.6
New Hampshire 987 5.6 1,267 7.7 135 5.4
Rhode Island 108 0.6 24 0.1 6 0.2
Vermont 4,188 23.6 10,304 62.6 273 10.9
MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES            
New Jersey 753 4.2 142 0.9 47 1.9
New York 1,999 11.3 1,897 11.5 297 11.8
Pennsylvania 536 3.0 197 1.2 89 3.5
EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Illinois 170 1.0 S S S S
Indiana 58 0.3 S S S S
Michigan 40 0.2 S S S S
Ohio 294 1.7 46 0.3 33 1.3
Wisconsin 124 0.7 S S S S
WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES            
Iowa 64 0.4 S S S S
Kansas 21 0.1 2 2
Minnesota S S S S S S
Missouri 77 0.4 3 4 0.2
Nebraska S S S S S S
North Dakota 17 S S S S
South Dakota S S S S S S
SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES            
Delaware 22 0.1 S S S S
District of Columbia S S S S S S
Florida S S S S S S
Georgia 182 1.0 89 0.5 99 3.9
Maryland 261 1.5 79 0.5 39 1.5
North Carolina S S 61 0.4 52 2.1
South Carolina 43 0.2 15 15 0.6
Virginia S S 19 0.1 13 0.5
West Virginia 68 0.4 S S S S
EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Alabama S S S S S S
Kentucky 71 0.4 10 9 0.4
Mississippi S S S S S S
Tennessee 55 0.3 7 8 0.3
WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES            
Arkansas S S S S S S
Louisiana S S S S S S
Oklahoma S S S S S S
Texas 99 0.6 40 0.2 83 3.3
MOUNTAIN STATES            
Arizona 19 0.1 S S S S
Colorado S S S S S S
Idaho S S S S S S
Montana S S S S S S
Nevada S S S S S S
New Mexico S S S S S S
Utah S S S S S S
Wyoming S S S S S S
PACIFIC STATES            
Alaska S S S S S S
California 468 2.6 80 0.5 235 9.3
Hawaii S S S S S S
Oregon 24 0.1 S S S S
Washington S S S S 2

KEY:
– Represents data cell equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network. See "Mileage Calculations" section for additional information.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Appendix B tables provide estimated measures of sampling variability. The Introduction and appendixes give information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
Coverage for the 2002 Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) differs from the previous surveys due to a change from the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification System to the 1997 North American Industry Classification System and other survey improvements. Therefore, data users are urged to use caution when comparing 2002 CFS estimates with estimates from prior years.

SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.