Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 182,785 100 268,926 100 58,222 100 9.1 - 9.8 - 11.2 -
Alabama 72,342 39.6 185,312 68.9 10,797 18.5 13.5 2.3 13.3 2.9 17.9 3.1
Alaska 36 - 16 - S S 31.5 - 49.6 - S S
Arizona 750 0.4 252 0.1 478 0.8 29.9 0.1 33.5 - 36.9 0.2
Arkansas 1,405 0.8 1,415 0.5 808 1.4 12.1 0.1 14.9 0.1 18 0.1
California 5,179 2.8 2,347 0.9 5,726 9.8 17.1 0.5 23.9 0.2 23.8 1.4
Colorado 680 0.4 345 0.1 S S 19.4 0.1 47.7 - S S
Connecticut 393 0.2 S S S S 29.1 0.1 S S S S
Delaware 216 0.1 95 - 87 0.1 47.9 - 36.2 - 36.3 0.1
District of Columbia 36 - 5 - 4 - 36.5 - 49.3 - 48.2 -
Florida 9,208 5 6,750 2.5 3,066 5.3 8 0.5 10.6 0.4 13 0.7
Georgia 18,695 10.2 15,324 5.7 3,648 6.3 14.1 1.1 9.5 0.8 11.6 0.7
Hawaii 19 - S S S S 47.1 - S S S S
Idaho S S S S S S S S S S S S
Illinois 3,454 1.9 2,493 0.9 2,056 3.5 19.1 0.2 35.3 0.3 42.5 0.8
Indiana 1,911 1 2,056 0.8 1,397 2.4 15 0.1 25.3 0.2 26.4 0.6
Iowa 653 0.4 425 0.2 412 0.7 23 0.1 27 - 29.9 0.2
Kansas 568 0.3 204 0.1 175 0.3 23.8 - 15.4 - 15.6 0.1
Kentucky 2,857 1.6 1,911 0.7 784 1.3 42.3 0.4 23.4 0.1 21.4 0.3
Louisiana 3,557 1.9 3,767 1.4 1,032 1.8 14.1 0.4 15 0.3 11.1 0.2
Maine 173 0.1 89 - 132 0.2 27.4 - 29.1 - 28.5 0.1
Maryland 1,434 0.8 527 0.2 467 0.8 17.8 0.1 16.7 - 16.4 0.2
Massachusetts 775 0.4 332 0.1 424 0.7 20.2 0.1 30.1 - 29.1 0.2
Michigan 2,670 1.5 1,370 0.5 1,232 2.1 18.5 0.3 13.8 0.1 14.6 0.2
Minnesota 678 0.4 599 0.2 701 1.2 17.6 0.1 21.4 0.1 21.1 0.3
Mississippi 10,463 5.7 11,609 4.3 2,282 3.9 25.6 1.2 20.5 0.7 24.6 1
Missouri 1,364 0.7 998 0.4 678 1.2 11.7 0.1 12.5 0.1 16.1 0.3
Montana 93 0.1 32 - 69 0.1 21.9 - 22.9 - 24.8 -
Nebraska 409 0.2 311 0.1 316 0.5 25.5 0.1 39.7 0.1 37.2 0.3
Nevada 116 0.1 19 - 43 0.1 16.5 - 25.5 - 26.1 -
New Hampshire 148 0.1 48 - 61 0.1 25.2 - 35.4 - 33.8 -
New Jersey 1,826 1 628 0.2 679 1.2 18 0.2 18.2 0.1 20 0.3
New Mexico 215 0.1 34 - 48 0.1 36.3 - 33.2 - 33.3 -
New York 2,609 1.4 706 0.3 806 1.4 11 0.2 13.7 - 13.8 0.2
North Carolina 4,250 2.3 3,042 1.1 1,687 2.9 10.7 0.4 12.6 0.2 13.1 0.3
North Dakota 65 - S S S S 23.1 - S S S S
Ohio 2,789 1.5 1,753 0.7 1,347 2.3 17.4 0.3 14.9 0.1 17.8 0.6
Oklahoma 954 0.5 673 0.3 606 1 25.8 0.1 41.8 0.1 39.3 0.2
Oregon 610 0.3 S S S S 34.4 0.1 S S S S
Pennsylvania 2,704 1.5 1,828 0.7 1,689 2.9 18.9 0.3 25 0.2 25.1 0.7
Rhode Island 40 - 26 - 33 0.1 36.1 - 43.4 - 42.6 -
South Carolina 4,248 2.3 3,777 1.4 1,625 2.8 10.4 0.3 16.6 0.3 14.2 0.5
South Dakota 40 - 25 - 31 0.1 42.5 - 48.5 - 46.2 -
Tennessee 9,473 5.2 7,892 2.9 1,824 3.1 23.1 0.9 13.6 0.4 11.7 0.3
Texas 7,795 4.3 6,076 2.3 4,967 8.5 15.6 0.5 20.9 0.4 20.4 0.9
Utah 388 0.2 163 0.1 318 0.5 31.3 0.1 39.3 - 40.6 0.2
Vermont 103 0.1 28 - 38 0.1 45.9 - 46.1 - 46.4 -
Virginia 1,417 0.8 870 0.3 652 1.1 13.5 0.1 14.6 0.1 15.7 0.2
Washington 1,096 0.6 138 0.1 367 0.6 37.2 0.3 22.1 - 21.8 0.2
West Virginia 477 0.3 404 0.2 251 0.4 25.3 0.1 34.2 0.1 33.3 0.2
Wisconsin 1,103 0.6 1,128 0.4 1,071 1.8 7.5 0.1 12.9 0.1 12.1 0.2
Wyoming S S S S S S S S S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.