Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 141,964 100 149,325 100 43,766 100 4.5 - 10.3 - 10 -
Alabama 680 0.5 345 0.2 S S 19.4 0.1 47.7 0.1 S S
Alaska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Arizona 1,761 1.2 853 0.6 683 1.6 26.8 0.3 28.4 0.2 27.9 0.3
Arkansas 768 0.5 1,401 0.9 1,520 3.5 15.9 0.1 45.9 0.2 42.8 1
California 10,839 7.6 2,394 1.6 2,700 6.2 8.9 0.6 13 0.2 12.9 0.7
Colorado 60,539 42.6 95,881 64.2 5,198 11.9 5.9 1.3 14 3.4 21.5 2.3
Connecticut 302 0.2 26 - 51 0.1 14.2 - 39.2 - 39.9 -
Delaware S S S S S S S S S S S S
District of Columbia 3 - S S S S 23.4 - S S S S
Florida 1,528 1.1 145 0.1 267 0.6 21.2 0.2 27.1 0.1 25.7 0.2
Georgia 1,522 1.1 383 0.3 576 1.3 22 0.2 16.7 0.1 17.2 0.3
Hawaii S S - - - - S S 43.2 - 42.8 -
Idaho 509 0.4 772 0.5 758 1.7 11.5 0.1 26.2 0.2 23.8 0.4
Illinois 4,139 2.9 742 0.5 751 1.7 11.4 0.4 12.3 0.1 12.6 0.4
Indiana 2,852 2 667 0.4 750 1.7 22.2 0.4 12.6 0.1 12.1 0.4
Iowa 1,579 1.1 515 0.3 410 0.9 15.6 0.2 18.8 0.1 19.8 0.2
Kansas 2,458 1.7 1,721 1.2 791 1.8 25.2 0.4 20.1 0.3 19.6 0.5
Kentucky 822 0.6 256 0.2 324 0.7 20.2 0.1 20.5 - 21.7 0.2
Louisiana 498 0.4 574 0.4 847 1.9 25.9 0.1 43.6 0.2 49 1.1
Maine 70 - 37 - 87 0.2 33.6 - 40.4 - 40.9 0.1
Maryland 390 0.3 37 - 61 0.1 34.3 0.1 48.6 - 48.6 0.1
Massachusetts 1,037 0.7 123 0.1 249 0.6 20.6 0.1 35.1 - 35.6 0.2
Michigan 1,960 1.4 526 0.4 688 1.6 18.4 0.2 26.2 0.3 27.1 0.7
Minnesota 1,693 1.2 1,653 1.1 1,722 3.9 13 0.1 30 0.3 30.1 1.2
Mississippi 295 0.2 127 0.1 165 0.4 20.8 - 24.8 - 25.3 0.1
Missouri 1,297 0.9 570 0.4 427 1 11.4 0.1 33.4 0.2 30.1 0.5
Montana 214 0.2 176 0.1 165 0.4 14.3 - 20.6 - 21.1 0.1
Nebraska 2,102 1.5 4,123 2.8 1,204 2.8 20.7 0.3 31.5 1.1 32.1 1
Nevada 1,013 0.7 205 0.1 178 0.4 18.1 0.2 12.2 - 11.3 0.1
New Hampshire 190 0.1 S S S S 26.1 - S S S S
New Jersey 1,484 1 86 0.1 155 0.4 23.1 0.2 27.3 - 28.3 0.1
New Mexico 858 0.6 757 0.5 S S 17.5 0.1 45.8 0.3 S S
New York 2,875 2 189 0.1 325 0.7 25.2 0.7 27 0.1 26.9 0.3
North Carolina 1,057 0.7 242 0.2 414 0.9 9.4 0.1 12 0.1 12.8 0.3
North Dakota 343 0.2 200 0.1 236 0.5 49.5 0.1 43 0.1 46 0.2
Ohio 2,913 2.1 619 0.4 817 1.9 20.6 0.4 23.3 0.1 22.7 0.3
Oklahoma 1,140 0.8 1,251 0.8 1,085 2.5 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.2 17.8 0.4
Oregon 2,378 1.7 918 0.6 1,287 2.9 38.8 0.5 22.6 0.2 23 0.7
Pennsylvania 2,728 1.9 539 0.4 990 2.3 32.2 0.5 42 0.2 45.9 0.8
Rhode Island 87 0.1 10 - 19 - 25.7 - 44.8 - 44 -
South Carolina 345 0.2 81 0.1 147 0.3 14.8 - 37.3 - 43.3 0.2
South Dakota 314 0.2 263 0.2 132 0.3 21.8 - 33.2 0.1 31.7 0.2
Tennessee 6,816 4.8 475 0.3 655 1.5 40.7 1.5 34.7 0.1 40 0.6
Texas 9,203 6.5 4,422 3 3,084 7 9.6 0.7 24.5 1.1 13.5 1.4
Utah 2,830 2 1,907 1.3 1,089 2.5 12.9 0.3 16.7 0.3 17.7 0.4
Vermont 62 - S S S S 26.2 - S S S S
Virginia 802 0.6 110 0.1 196 0.4 20.4 0.2 43 0.1 44.5 0.3
Washington 1,232 0.9 539 0.4 715 1.6 12.3 0.1 27.7 0.1 26.5 0.4
West Virginia 249 0.2 26 - 40 0.1 31.1 0.1 28.3 - 28.5 0.1
Wisconsin 1,582 1.1 S S S S 14.7 0.2 S S S S
Wyoming 1,367 1 20,516 13.7 8,290 18.9 14.6 0.1 36.7 3.1 39.5 4.4

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.