Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 2,876 100 4,505 100 57 100 20.4 - 26.3 - 18.4 -
Alabama 2 0.1 S S S S 35.8 - S S S S
Alaska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Arizona 2 0.1 - - - 0.5 29.9 0.1 44.5 - 41.8 0.9
Arkansas S S S S S S S S S S S S
California 23 0.8 1 - 2 3.1 48.1 0.7 31.6 0.1 31.9 5.2
Colorado 3 0.1 S S S S 23.4 0.2 S S S S
Connecticut S S - - - 0.1 S S 50 0.1 49.7 0.4
Delaware S S S S S S S S S S S S
District of Columbia 1,590 55.3 3,439 76.3 17 30.5 26 4.7 28.3 7.2 37 7.6
Florida 4 0.1 - - - 0.2 27.6 0.2 36.4 - 37 0.7
Georgia S S S S S S S S S S S S
Hawaii - - S S S S 23.8 0.1 S S S S
Illinois 14 0.5 1 - 1 0.9 32.6 0.3 37.6 0.1 37.3 1.2
Indiana 1 - S S S S 21.6 0.1 S S S S
Iowa S S S S S S S S S S S S
Kansas 2 0.1 - - - 0.1 35.7 0.1 46.8 - 50 0.3
Kentucky S S S S S S S S S S S S
Louisiana S S S S S S S S S S S S
Maine S S S S S S S S S S S S
Maryland 446 15.5 314 7 5 9.6 27.9 3.4 34.6 3.1 36.7 2.7
Massachusetts S S - - - 0.3 S S 46.7 - 46.2 0.3
Michigan 9 0.3 1 - 1 1.1 36.1 0.3 41.3 0.1 38 0.8
Minnesota S S S S S S S S S S S S
Missouri S S S S S S S S S S S S
Montana S S - - - - S S 31.5 - 34.1 -
Nebraska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Nevada S S S S S S S S S S S S
New Hampshire 3 0.1 S S S S 41.1 0.2 S S S S
New Jersey S S 2 - - 0.6 S S 44.1 - 44.7 0.3
New Mexico S S S S S S S S S S S S
New York 82 2.8 3 0.1 1 2.5 49.1 1.4 42.7 0.2 42.5 1.3
North Carolina 9 0.3 27 0.6 7 12.7 39 0.3 47.3 1.5 44.9 7.6
North Dakota S S S S S S S S S S S S
Ohio 7 0.2 - - - 0.3 20.6 0.1 33.3 - 30.9 0.4
Oklahoma 7 0.2 S S S S 40.6 0.2 S S S S
Oregon 2 0.1 S S S S 34.2 - S S S S
Pennsylvania 38 1.3 7 0.1 1 1.7 26.4 0.6 32.1 0.2 31.6 0.6
Rhode Island S S S S S S S S S S S S
South Carolina S S S S S S S S S S S S
Tennessee S S S S S S S S S S S S
Texas S S - - S S S S 46 - S S
Utah 1 - - - - - 39.5 - 45.9 - 45.7 -
Vermont S S S S S S S S S S S S
Virginia 460 16 706 15.7 18 30.9 27.9 3.4 48.5 4.3 30 4.8
Washington 5 0.2 S S S S 44.1 0.1 S S S S
West Virginia 3 0.1 - - - 0.1 44.6 0.1 42 - 41.1 0.1
Wisconsin S S S S - - S S S S 49.8 -
Wyoming S S S S S S S S S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.