Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 12,754 100 10,117 100 908 100 14.3 - 24.9 - 36.5 -
Alabama 36 0.3 5 - 4 0.4 36.5 0.1 49.3 0.1 48.2 0.6
Arizona S S S S S S S S S S S S
Arkansas S S S S S S S S S S S S
California 696 5.5 20 0.2 54 6 35.2 2 34.5 0.2 34.5 2.1
Colorado S S S S S S S S S S S S
Connecticut 117 0.9 6 0.1 2 0.2 46.8 0.8 42.3 0.1 42.4 0.1
Delaware 30 0.2 S S S S 24.1 0.2 S S S S
District of Columbia 1,590 12.5 3,439 34 17 1.9 26 2.6 28.3 5.3 37 2.3
Florida 118 0.9 S S S S 25.3 0.3 S S S S
Georgia 99 0.8 4 - 2 0.3 38.9 0.4 39.8 - 39 0.3
Hawaii S S S S S S S S S S S S
Idaho S S S S S S S S S S S S
Illinois 347 2.7 21 0.2 15 1.6 41.8 1.3 34.9 0.2 35 1.1
Indiana S S 6 0.1 4 0.4 S S 46.6 0.1 45.4 0.4
Iowa S S S S S S S S S S S S
Kansas 14 0.1 1 - 1 0.1 41.3 0.1 41 - 40.7 0.2
Kentucky 53 0.4 5 0.1 3 0.3 43.7 0.2 36.7 0.1 38.3 0.5
Louisiana S S - - - - S S 38.5 - 38.6 0.1
Maine 4 - S S S S 44.3 0.1 S S S S
Maryland 3,778 29.6 1,753 17.3 57 6.2 31.4 3.1 13.3 4.7 16 2.1
Massachusetts S S 18 0.2 8 0.8 S S 33.5 0.3 33.5 1
Michigan 76 0.6 9 0.1 5 0.6 41 0.2 40 0.1 36 0.3
Minnesota S S 4 - 5 0.5 S S 32.6 - 33.9 0.3
Mississippi 8 0.1 - - - - 40.6 0.1 34.2 - 33 0.1
Missouri 45 0.4 4 - S S 33.7 0.3 42.1 0.1 S S
Montana S S - - - - S S 42.9 - 38.7 -
Nebraska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Nevada S S S S S S S S S S S S
New Hampshire 12 0.1 S S S S 31.5 0.1 S S S S
New Jersey 522 4.1 161 1.6 32 3.5 33.7 0.8 32.1 1.3 33.4 1.6
New Mexico S S S S S S S S S S S S
New York 445 3.5 51 0.5 20 2.2 25.8 0.8 30.3 0.3 34 1.5
North Carolina S S S S S S S S S S S S
North Dakota S S S S S S S S S S S S
Ohio 206 1.6 95 0.9 43 4.7 20.1 0.5 27.9 1.1 31.1 3.1
Oklahoma S S S S S S S S S S S S
Oregon S S 2 - 4 0.5 S S 45.5 0.1 45.5 1.4
Pennsylvania 771 6 280 2.8 41 4.5 21.2 1.6 32.5 1 26 1.8
Rhode Island 6 - S S S S 38.9 0.1 S S S S
South Carolina 38 0.3 9 0.1 4 0.5 46.6 0.2 37.1 0.2 39 0.6
South Dakota S S S S S S S S S S S S
Tennessee S S S S 3 0.3 S S S S 47.8 0.1
Texas 184 1.4 28 0.3 40 4.4 24.5 0.4 39.4 0.3 38.5 2.9
Utah S S S S S S S S S S S S
Vermont S S S S S S S S S S S S
Virginia 1,794 14.1 3,813 37.7 125 13.8 12.7 1.4 44 6 27.4 4.8
Washington S S S S S S S S S S S S
West Virginia S S 28 0.3 7 0.8 S S 47 0.4 49.1 0.8
Wisconsin 68 0.5 10 0.1 8 0.9 23.5 0.2 44.9 0.1 44.2 0.5
Wyoming S S S S S S S S S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.