Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 377,718 100 372,777 100 70,173 100 4.9 - 11.1 - 4.4 -
Alabama 18,186 4.8 16,599 4.5 3,695 5.3 12.1 0.4 12.2 0.8 14.7 0.9
Alaska 76 - S S S S 38.6 - S S S S
Arizona 1,475 0.4 239 0.1 459 0.7 27.8 0.1 13.5 - 13.9 0.1
Arkansas 1,911 0.5 1,052 0.3 772 1.1 11.5 - 19.8 0.1 21.8 0.3
California 8,091 2.1 2,205 0.6 5,238 7.5 12.8 0.2 21 0.2 20.1 1.4
Colorado 1,522 0.4 383 0.1 576 0.8 22 0.1 16.7 - 17.2 0.1
Connecticut 741 0.2 182 - 193 0.3 11.6 - 19.9 - 21 -
Delaware 272 0.1 102 - 78 0.1 16.6 - 30 - 32 -
District of Columbia 99 - 4 - 2 - 38.9 - 39.8 - 39 -
Florida 35,084 9.3 20,214 5.4 7,328 10.4 10.5 0.6 9.8 0.9 9.2 1.1
Georgia 162,276 43 265,041 71.1 12,411 17.7 7.3 1.7 14.4 2.7 11.3 1.4
Hawaii S S 4 - 25 - S S 33.1 - 39 -
Idaho 314 0.1 179 - 409 0.6 20.9 - 47 - 48.7 0.3
Illinois 7,298 1.9 2,203 0.6 1,705 2.4 14.7 0.2 15.1 0.1 15.4 0.3
Indiana 3,230 0.9 1,526 0.4 971 1.4 5.4 - 10.4 - 10.8 0.1
Iowa 1,338 0.4 460 0.1 469 0.7 14.8 - 6.7 - 6.5 0.1
Kansas 1,423 0.4 392 0.1 383 0.5 22 0.1 19 - 18.6 0.1
Kentucky 5,692 1.5 2,253 0.6 1,014 1.4 21.1 0.4 16.8 0.2 17.3 0.3
Louisiana 3,826 1 1,695 0.5 1,027 1.5 8.6 0.1 9.5 0.1 9.4 0.1
Maine 597 0.2 305 0.1 487 0.7 18.1 - 21.6 - 23.8 0.2
Maryland 3,375 0.9 1,164 0.3 848 1.2 17.1 0.2 13.5 0.1 13.9 0.2
Massachusetts S S 557 0.1 625 0.9 S S 14.5 - 15.4 0.2
Michigan 4,244 1.1 2,556 0.7 2,302 3.3 14.6 0.2 17.4 0.1 17.5 0.5
Minnesota 1,645 0.4 770 0.2 975 1.4 7.7 - 16.8 - 18.2 0.2
Mississippi 3,356 0.9 2,210 0.6 989 1.4 10.5 0.1 15.5 0.1 15.1 0.3
Missouri 2,232 0.6 856 0.2 624 0.9 13.2 0.1 11.4 - 12.4 0.1
Montana 460 0.1 82 - S S 33.5 - 49.7 - S S
Nebraska 458 0.1 319 0.1 405 0.6 11 - 34.6 - 38.4 0.2
Nevada S S 94 - 210 0.3 S S 37.2 - 39 0.1
New Hampshire 345 0.1 94 - 118 0.2 17.9 - 25.2 - 25.2 -
New Jersey 2,874 0.8 1,002 0.3 896 1.3 8.3 0.1 13.5 - 14.5 0.2
New Mexico 177 - 35 - 51 0.1 13.5 - 20.8 - 20.5 -
New York 6,023 1.6 1,748 0.5 1,704 2.4 8.3 0.1 18.6 0.1 18.5 0.4
North Carolina 23,077 6.1 9,464 2.5 3,070 4.4 12.2 0.6 13.5 0.3 10.2 0.3
North Dakota 281 0.1 72 - 116 0.2 17.9 - 36.5 - 39.7 0.1
Ohio 5,390 1.4 2,720 0.7 1,783 2.5 9.7 0.1 7.7 0.1 7.7 0.2
Oklahoma 2,347 0.6 709 0.2 669 1 42 0.3 35.9 0.1 35.1 0.3
Oregon 601 0.2 228 0.1 646 0.9 18.6 - 25.1 - 25.1 0.2
Pennsylvania 5,174 1.4 2,180 0.6 1,764 2.5 10.7 0.1 11.1 0.1 11.1 0.2
Rhode Island 117 - 53 - 59 0.1 25.8 - 38.3 - 38.7 -
South Carolina 16,646 4.4 13,208 3.5 2,419 3.4 6.5 0.3 26 0.6 21 0.6
South Dakota 98 - S S S S 26.8 - S S S S
Tennessee 15,756 4.2 7,390 2 2,003 2.9 5.7 0.2 12.6 0.3 9.7 0.2
Texas 13,607 3.6 5,015 1.3 5,234 7.5 10.5 0.4 12.8 0.2 14.6 1.2
Utah 790 0.2 209 0.1 424 0.6 19.5 - 25.1 - 26.6 0.2
Vermont 207 0.1 32 - 37 0.1 34.8 - 22.3 - 23.3 -
Virginia 4,767 1.3 2,437 0.7 1,322 1.9 10.3 0.1 8.9 0.1 8.7 0.2
Washington 1,813 0.5 622 0.2 1,704 2.4 12.2 0.1 24.4 0.1 24.1 0.6
West Virginia 1,042 0.3 722 0.2 429 0.6 18 - 30 0.1 30.2 0.2
Wisconsin 2,083 0.6 1,094 0.3 1,151 1.6 14.3 0.1 11.4 - 10.7 0.2
Wyoming 168 - S S S S 30.8 - S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.