Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 412,749 100 438,260 100 131,584 100 4.2 - 8.2 - 10.2 -
Alabama 18,695 4.5 15,324 3.5 3,648 2.8 14.1 0.4 9.5 0.5 11.6 0.4
Alaska 1 - S S S S 44 - S S S S
Arizona 1,382 0.3 133 - 247 0.2 28.4 0.1 21.6 - 21.6 0.1
Arkansas 1,995 0.5 1,062 0.2 725 0.6 21.5 0.1 14.5 - 14 0.1
California 12,956 3.1 1,744 0.4 4,228 3.2 16 0.5 11.1 - 11.2 0.4
Colorado 1,845 0.4 1,040 0.2 2,055 1.6 24.3 0.1 40.6 0.1 47 0.8
Connecticut 1,322 0.3 236 0.1 231 0.2 17 0.1 20.2 - 19.3 0.1
Delaware S S S S S S S S S S S S
District of Columbia S S S S S S S S S S S S
Florida 16,179 3.9 11,384 2.6 3,753 2.9 8.3 0.3 11.6 0.5 12.9 0.6
Georgia 162,276 39.3 265,041 60.5 12,411 9.4 7.3 1.8 14.4 3.6 11.3 0.9
Hawaii 3 - S S S S 36.3 - S S S S
Idaho 298 0.1 200 - 452 0.3 18.7 - 40 - 38.5 0.2
Illinois 15,403 3.7 6,979 1.6 5,585 4.2 7.9 0.4 21.1 0.3 22.7 1.2
Indiana 9,609 2.3 6,687 1.5 4,553 3.5 9.7 0.3 16.7 0.3 17.7 0.8
Iowa 2,759 0.7 S S S S 10.7 0.1 S S S S
Kansas 1,999 0.5 792 0.2 804 0.6 13.4 0.1 20.5 - 20.5 0.1
Kentucky 7,466 1.8 24,836 5.7 13,989 10.6 18.6 0.4 30 1.6 32.7 2.6
Louisiana 4,232 1 4,265 1 2,826 2.1 18.2 0.2 15.7 0.1 14.7 0.5
Maine 283 0.1 252 0.1 395 0.3 25.9 - 32.4 - 34.6 0.2
Maryland 2,149 0.5 759 0.2 555 0.4 21.3 0.1 25.4 - 26.1 0.1
Massachusetts 2,441 0.6 362 0.1 398 0.3 18.9 0.1 18.1 - 18.7 0.1
Michigan 6,084 1.5 4,609 1.1 3,649 2.8 13.9 0.2 30.6 0.4 29.8 1.2
Minnesota 4,760 1.2 1,321 0.3 1,794 1.4 36.7 0.3 33.1 0.2 36.5 0.6
Mississippi 3,904 0.9 2,670 0.6 1,475 1.1 9.3 0.1 14.4 0.1 20.8 0.3
Missouri 4,938 1.2 1,767 0.4 1,278 1 18.1 0.2 11.4 0.1 11.8 0.2
Montana 48 - 32 - 72 0.1 44.2 - 34.6 - 35.9 -
Nebraska 1,232 0.3 385 0.1 419 0.3 16.8 0.1 24.2 - 24.3 0.1
Nevada 301 0.1 82 - 183 0.1 17.2 - 27.1 - 25.2 0.1
New Hampshire 386 0.1 38 - 44 - 15.4 - 18.8 - 19.1 -
New Jersey 5,767 1.4 735 0.2 631 0.5 10.6 0.2 15.3 - 15.2 0.1
New Mexico 215 0.1 38 - 58 - 30.3 - 40 - 39.1 -
New York 8,782 2.1 2,668 0.6 2,525 1.9 13.8 0.3 32.7 0.2 31.1 0.4
North Carolina 22,260 5.4 7,683 1.8 2,643 2 22.8 0.8 6.9 0.2 7.1 0.3
North Dakota S S 107 - 162 0.1 S S 37.4 - 36.8 0.1
Ohio 8,300 2 4,155 0.9 2,909 2.2 7.4 0.2 12.4 0.1 13.2 0.3
Oklahoma 1,431 0.3 640 0.1 635 0.5 15.8 0.1 10.5 - 11.3 0.1
Oregon 804 0.2 368 0.1 1,011 0.8 14.6 - 28.6 - 28.4 0.2
Pennsylvania 8,263 2 2,802 0.6 2,184 1.7 18.9 0.5 6.9 0.1 6.6 0.2
Rhode Island 381 0.1 80 - 85 0.1 16 - 31.5 - 31.4 -
South Carolina 13,118 3.2 11,727 2.7 2,186 1.7 9.5 0.3 20.3 0.8 16.6 0.6
South Dakota 202 - 238 0.1 351 0.3 16.3 - 45.3 - 48.4 0.2
Tennessee 26,519 6.4 9,157 2.1 2,281 1.7 20.9 1.6 9.4 0.3 6.8 0.3
Texas 14,817 3.6 9,602 2.2 9,048 6.9 17.7 0.6 32.8 0.7 31.8 2.7
Utah S S S S S S S S S S S S
Vermont 240 0.1 S S S S 35.7 - S S S S
Virginia 5,323 1.3 14,170 3.2 6,405 4.9 9.1 0.2 46.3 1.5 46.1 1.7
Washington 1,095 0.3 369 0.1 1,006 0.8 21.5 0.1 17.8 - 17.7 0.2
West Virginia 1,186 0.3 S S S S 16.2 - S S S S
Wisconsin 4,585 1.1 2,061 0.5 2,061 1.6 10.8 0.1 15.3 0.1 16.5 0.3
Wyoming 134 - 13,028 3 23,524 17.9 38.5 - 47.3 1.4 47.2 4.6

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.