Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 149,210 100 178,327 100 41,690 100 10.5 - 10.4 - 12 -
Alabama 749 0.5 S S S S 22.6 0.1 S S S S
Alaska 89 0.1 7 - S S 48.1 - 43.8 - S S
Arizona 780 0.5 411 0.2 484 1.2 20.8 0.1 19.3 0.1 18 0.4
Arkansas 3,212 2.2 805 0.5 327 0.8 37.9 0.6 9.9 0.1 13.4 0.2
California 5,470 3.7 2,533 1.4 4,262 10.2 11.4 0.5 25.9 0.5 27.5 3
Colorado 2,458 1.6 1,721 1 791 1.9 25.2 0.3 20.1 0.3 19.6 0.4
Connecticut 1,092 0.7 101 0.1 138 0.3 28.3 0.3 37.3 - 36.3 0.1
Delaware S S 13 - 17 - S S 48.4 - 49.6 -
District of Columbia 14 - 1 - 1 - 41.3 - 41 - 40.7 -
Florida 2,864 1.9 397 0.2 586 1.4 16 0.2 16.2 - 16.9 0.2
Georgia 1,999 1.3 792 0.4 804 1.9 13.4 0.3 20.5 0.1 20.5 0.4
Hawaii 61 - S S 17 - 33.5 - S S 39.8 -
Idaho 174 0.1 94 0.1 122 0.3 22.8 - 43.1 - 45.5 0.1
Illinois 7,264 4.9 2,031 1.1 1,089 2.6 14.8 0.6 15.4 0.3 15.6 0.5
Indiana 1,785 1.2 673 0.4 448 1.1 17.7 0.2 20.8 0.1 19.3 0.2
Iowa 3,416 2.3 1,991 1.1 904 2.2 23.4 0.3 16.7 0.2 18.1 0.4
Kansas 50,337 33.7 107,506 60.3 6,357 15.2 13.5 3 14.8 4.1 17 2.4
Kentucky 1,418 1 489 0.3 338 0.8 20.8 0.1 23 0.1 23.5 0.2
Louisiana 560 0.4 231 0.1 195 0.5 17.4 - 28.5 0.1 27.4 0.1
Maine 155 0.1 25 - 45 0.1 30 - 29.3 - 29.5 -
Maryland 700 0.5 175 0.1 203 0.5 16.3 0.1 31.8 - 30.9 0.1
Massachusetts 656 0.4 142 0.1 226 0.5 17.8 0.1 22.2 - 22.7 0.1
Michigan 1,511 1 429 0.2 380 0.9 14.2 0.1 18.8 - 18.8 0.2
Minnesota 1,736 1.2 1,052 0.6 813 2 13 0.2 22.5 0.1 24.6 0.4
Mississippi 291 0.2 178 0.1 147 0.4 22.2 0.1 45.6 - 45.7 0.2
Missouri 16,163 10.8 21,512 12.1 1,952 4.7 21.8 1.3 25.2 2.1 16.7 0.6
Montana 239 0.2 89 - 112 0.3 10.5 - 29.6 - 27.5 0.1
Nebraska 4,229 2.8 4,057 2.3 1,238 3 35 0.5 16.9 0.4 11 0.3
Nevada 433 0.3 97 0.1 136 0.3 46.2 0.1 25.2 - 24 0.2
New Hampshire 138 0.1 45 - 79 0.2 33.7 - 30.8 - 31.6 -
New Jersey 1,150 0.8 288 0.2 395 0.9 14 0.1 22.1 - 22.4 0.2
New Mexico 627 0.4 336 0.2 195 0.5 36.2 0.1 40.8 0.1 23.6 0.1
New York 2,116 1.4 487 0.3 655 1.6 19.6 0.3 16.9 - 15.6 0.2
North Carolina 1,836 1.2 899 0.5 1,133 2.7 18.5 0.2 35.9 0.1 35.1 0.8
North Dakota 287 0.2 124 0.1 107 0.3 22.3 0.1 29 - 28 0.1
Ohio 2,668 1.8 917 0.5 742 1.8 15.8 0.2 21.4 0.1 20.2 0.4
Oklahoma 4,755 3.2 10,229 5.7 1,921 4.6 18 0.3 14.3 1.2 17.2 0.7
Oregon S S 145 0.1 272 0.7 S S 30.6 - 32 0.2
Pennsylvania 2,138 1.4 626 0.4 744 1.8 19.5 0.2 20.2 0.1 20.3 0.2
Rhode Island 31 - S S S S 39.5 - S S S S
South Carolina 892 0.6 105 0.1 128 0.3 42.1 0.2 31.9 - 31.8 0.1
South Dakota 648 0.4 347 0.2 205 0.5 31.9 0.1 32.9 0.1 33.5 0.2
Tennessee 1,769 1.2 399 0.2 301 0.7 18.3 0.2 12.6 - 12 0.1
Texas 12,081 8.1 13,800 7.7 10,388 24.9 12.1 0.9 36.2 2 38.6 5.4
Utah 698 0.5 239 0.1 251 0.6 38.6 0.2 29.4 - 26.3 0.2
Vermont 23 - 6 - 10 - 30.8 - 42.2 - 41.5 -
Virginia 1,098 0.7 301 0.2 365 0.9 24 0.2 37.9 - 37.2 0.3
Washington 2,105 1.4 397 0.2 753 1.8 22.6 0.3 29.8 0.1 29.6 0.6
West Virginia 70 - S S S S 37.5 - S S S S
Wisconsin 1,485 1 400 0.2 278 0.7 11.7 0.1 15.5 - 15.5 0.1
Wyoming 150 0.1 37 - 29 0.1 13.9 - 23.4 - 23.8 -

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.