Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 204,554 100 143,546 100 28,320 100 6.2 - 9 - 7.9 -
Alabama 1,434 0.7 527 0.4 467 1.6 17.8 0.1 16.7 0.1 16.4 0.3
Alaska 2 - - - 1 - 45.5 - 48.3 - 48.4 -
Arizona 327 0.2 15 - 36 0.1 15.4 - 40.7 - 41 0.1
Arkansas 742 0.4 162 0.1 197 0.7 31.8 0.2 33.9 - 36 0.2
California 10,076 4.9 877 0.6 2,406 8.5 40.9 1.6 23 0.1 22.3 1.1
Colorado 531 0.3 50 - 89 0.3 27.9 0.1 25.1 - 23.8 0.1
Connecticut 1,779 0.9 557 0.4 161 0.6 22.4 0.2 37.3 0.2 32.5 0.3
Delaware 1,121 0.5 2,100 1.5 123 0.4 10.7 0.1 40.9 0.8 45.7 0.2
District of Columbia 446 0.2 314 0.2 5 - 27.9 0.1 34.6 0.1 36.7 -
Florida 2,207 1.1 616 0.4 614 2.2 12.8 0.2 27.2 0.1 27.3 0.5
Georgia 3,375 1.7 1,164 0.8 848 3 17.1 0.3 13.5 0.1 13.9 0.4
Hawaii 2 - S S S S 41.8 - S S S S
Idaho S S 68 - 170 0.6 S S 37.6 - 39.2 0.2
Illinois 3,889 1.9 947 0.7 767 2.7 19.4 0.4 18.3 0.2 19.9 0.6
Indiana 2,319 1.1 970 0.7 662 2.3 21.4 0.2 21 0.2 22.7 0.6
Iowa 1,601 0.8 481 0.3 490 1.7 29.6 0.2 25.2 0.2 23.1 0.6
Kansas 700 0.3 175 0.1 203 0.7 16.3 0.1 31.8 - 30.9 0.2
Kentucky 2,377 1.2 S S S S 29 0.5 S S S S
Louisiana 458 0.2 453 0.3 596 2.1 25 0.1 34 0.1 34.1 0.8
Maine 146 0.1 139 0.1 91 0.3 14.8 - 33.6 - 32.8 0.1
Maryland 46,594 22.8 70,761 49.3 1,956 6.9 5.4 2.2 9.1 2.8 13.1 0.8
Massachusetts 2,285 1.1 346 0.2 145 0.5 19.9 0.2 18.6 0.1 19.1 0.1
Michigan 7,058 3.5 1,095 0.8 696 2.5 28.1 1.1 14.9 0.2 13.3 0.6
Minnesota 1,967 1 346 0.2 421 1.5 18.7 0.2 15.8 0.1 16.1 0.3
Mississippi 392 0.2 269 0.2 272 1 18.4 - 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.2
Missouri 2,906 1.4 341 0.2 338 1.2 37.3 0.5 18.4 0.1 19 0.3
Montana 21 - S S S S 38.6 - S S S S
Nebraska 445 0.2 152 0.1 221 0.8 37.7 0.1 41.6 0.1 44.8 0.4
Nevada 188 0.1 18 - 47 0.2 48.4 - 27.4 - 28 0.1
New Hampshire 472 0.2 87 0.1 44 0.2 20.7 0.1 35.3 - 36.9 0.1
New Jersey 22,252 10.9 3,501 2.4 657 2.3 31.9 2.4 17.8 0.6 22.5 0.7
New Mexico 81 - 13 - 27 0.1 12.6 - 29.3 - 29.6 -
New York 6,970 3.4 2,018 1.4 667 2.4 8.3 0.4 23.6 0.6 20.8 0.7
North Carolina 5,050 2.5 1,599 1.1 603 2.1 19 0.5 8.6 0.2 8.9 0.4
North Dakota 325 0.2 72 0.1 124 0.4 32.2 0.1 42.8 - 47.1 0.2
Ohio 7,020 3.4 1,970 1.4 916 3.2 20 0.8 14.8 0.2 15.8 0.5
Oklahoma 243 0.1 116 0.1 153 0.5 21.9 - 47.8 0.1 46.3 0.4
Oregon 544 0.3 172 0.1 509 1.8 24.5 0.1 38.3 - 38.4 0.6
Pennsylvania 19,992 9.8 22,000 15.3 3,830 13.5 9.5 0.8 35.3 3.3 46.7 3.5
Rhode Island 184 0.1 S S S S 29.1 - S S S S
South Carolina 1,722 0.8 867 0.6 486 1.7 17 0.2 25.6 0.2 27.4 0.5
South Dakota 113 0.1 S S S S 31.5 - S S S S
Tennessee 23,778 11.6 506 0.4 334 1.2 39.4 3.7 19.4 0.1 19.6 0.3
Texas 3,542 1.7 869 0.6 1,330 4.7 14.7 0.3 13 0.1 13.1 0.9
Utah 342 0.2 9 - 19 0.1 32.2 0.1 16 - 16.8 -
Vermont 118 0.1 49 - 24 0.1 27.8 - 25.6 - 24.6 -
Virginia 12,536 6.1 9,574 6.7 1,164 4.1 11.4 0.9 21.7 1.3 26.5 1.1
Washington 673 0.3 160 0.1 469 1.7 14.8 0.1 32.7 - 33.8 0.4
West Virginia 1,291 0.6 14,844 10.3 3,324 11.7 14.3 0.1 34.6 2.3 23.8 2.3
Wisconsin 1,664 0.8 410 0.3 380 1.3 19.7 0.1 21.9 0.1 22.1 0.3
Wyoming 28 - S S S S 26.6 - S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.