Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 237,290 100 285,018 100 114,425 100 4.1 - 4.3 - 13.2 -
Alabama 1,174 0.5 3,787 1.3 4,528 4 13.4 0.1 49.1 0.6 49 1.4
Alaska 365 0.2 4 - 6 - 28.5 - 21.1 - 33.1 -
Arizona 2,298 1 321 0.1 601 0.5 15.4 0.1 27.7 - 28 0.1
Arkansas 1,022 0.4 612 0.2 574 0.5 18 0.1 28.5 0.1 25.3 0.1
California 11,008 4.6 2,718 1 5,676 5 7.2 0.3 7.1 0.1 6.9 0.8
Colorado 1,693 0.7 1,653 0.6 1,722 1.5 13 0.1 30 0.2 30.1 0.6
Connecticut 1,148 0.5 S S S S 25.2 0.1 S S S S
Delaware 134 0.1 S S S S 23.8 - S S S S
District of Columbia S S 4 - 5 - S S 32.6 - 33.9 -
Florida 4,341 1.8 S S S S 9.7 0.2 S S S S
Georgia 4,760 2 1,321 0.5 1,794 1.6 36.7 0.6 33.1 0.2 36.5 0.7
Hawaii 206 0.1 30 - S S 33.9 - 44.3 - S S
Idaho 445 0.2 S S S S 17.5 - S S S S
Illinois 13,969 5.9 7,480 2.6 4,881 4.3 12.2 0.8 19.7 0.5 26.1 0.8
Indiana 4,257 1.8 8,943 3.1 7,590 6.6 19.2 0.3 44.7 1.3 47.7 2.4
Iowa 7,986 3.4 4,987 1.7 1,210 1.1 10.5 0.3 6.2 0.1 6.7 0.2
Kansas 1,500 0.6 605 0.2 374 0.3 18.9 0.1 26.1 0.1 21 0.1
Kentucky 1,777 0.7 370 0.1 325 0.3 17.2 0.1 27.1 - 31.1 0.1
Louisiana 2,777 1.2 7,306 2.6 12,273 10.7 18 0.3 33.2 0.9 33.6 2.9
Maine 641 0.3 216 0.1 362 0.3 21.9 0.1 42 - 40.9 0.2
Maryland 1,967 0.8 346 0.1 421 0.4 18.7 0.2 15.8 - 16.1 0.1
Massachusetts 1,686 0.7 286 0.1 410 0.4 10.9 0.1 15.4 - 15.4 0.1
Michigan 4,619 1.9 8,824 3.1 6,831 6 12.7 0.2 33.7 1 35.6 1.7
Minnesota 95,398 40.2 159,928 56.1 8,625 7.5 8.6 2.3 7.9 2.9 10.4 1.9
Mississippi 633 0.3 365 0.1 S S 21 0.1 48.5 0.1 S S
Missouri 2,910 1.2 1,861 0.7 1,304 1.1 10.7 0.2 29.4 0.2 31.2 0.6
Montana 635 0.3 201 0.1 214 0.2 27.6 0.1 23.4 - 23.8 0.1
Nebraska 1,779 0.7 1,335 0.5 651 0.6 17.8 0.1 20.9 0.1 21.8 0.3
Nevada 1,007 0.4 177 0.1 344 0.3 22.7 0.1 20.1 - 20.9 0.1
New Hampshire 561 0.2 139 - 215 0.2 23.9 0.1 42.7 - 43.4 0.1
New Jersey 2,939 1.2 1,008 0.4 1,299 1.1 16.7 0.2 32.2 0.1 30.9 0.3
New Mexico 523 0.2 176 0.1 268 0.2 27.6 0.1 29.5 - 28.6 -
New York 5,671 2.4 1,820 0.6 2,227 1.9 6.2 0.1 18.4 0.1 20.5 0.4
North Carolina 2,444 1 464 0.2 625 0.5 14 0.1 25.2 - 29.2 0.3
North Dakota 4,032 1.7 3,361 1.2 1,077 0.9 9.1 0.1 12.9 0.2 13.6 0.3
Ohio 4,233 1.8 S S S S 10.4 0.2 S S S S
Oklahoma 945 0.4 759 0.3 630 0.6 14.3 0.1 44.8 0.1 45.5 0.2
Oregon 848 0.4 S S S S 11 - S S S S
Pennsylvania 5,543 2.3 4,631 1.6 8,668 7.6 13.5 0.4 36.1 0.6 44.3 2.2
Rhode Island S S S S S S S S S S S S
South Carolina 902 0.4 207 0.1 257 0.2 32.1 0.1 46 - 46.2 0.1
South Dakota 3,814 1.6 7,223 2.5 1,155 1 12.3 0.2 38.5 1 19.9 0.3
Tennessee 2,705 1.1 720 0.3 721 0.6 15.7 0.2 21.4 0.1 20.4 0.2
Texas 7,661 3.2 3,520 1.2 4,561 4 6.8 0.2 13.1 0.2 13.8 0.5
Utah 1,066 0.4 207 0.1 295 0.3 8.3 - 17.6 - 19.4 -
Vermont 157 0.1 31 - 45 - 26.3 - 41.2 - 40.8 -
Virginia 2,361 1 626 0.2 824 0.7 15.4 0.2 29.1 0.1 29.5 0.1
Washington 4,160 1.8 S S S S 24 0.4 S S S S
West Virginia 300 0.1 68 - 76 0.1 26.1 - 42.4 - 43 -
Wisconsin 13,658 5.8 27,432 9.6 4,618 4 7.5 0.4 37.9 3.9 24.6 1.9
Wyoming 232 0.1 369 0.1 S S 16.1 - 49.3 0.1 S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.