Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 422,581 100 230,155 100 37,087 100 5.9 - 5.8 - 9.4 -
Alabama 2,695 0.6 266 0.1 252 0.7 43.8 0.3 22.1 - 20.1 0.2
Alaska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Arizona 1,926 0.5 126 0.1 312 0.8 24.1 0.1 21.8 - 21.9 0.3
Arkansas 1,339 0.3 126 0.1 151 0.4 28 0.1 23 - 21.9 0.1
California 15,338 3.6 2,035 0.9 6,038 16.3 8.9 0.4 20 0.3 21.3 2.7
Colorado 1,484 0.4 86 - 155 0.4 23.1 0.1 27.3 - 28.3 0.1
Connecticut 8,467 2 3,679 1.6 417 1.1 13.4 0.3 27.8 0.5 22.5 0.3
Delaware 3,365 0.8 2,196 1 167 0.4 12.3 0.1 18.7 0.2 25.8 0.1
District of Columbia 522 0.1 161 0.1 32 0.1 33.7 - 32.1 - 33.4 -
Florida 14,074 3.3 1,554 0.7 1,815 4.9 18.5 0.5 19.1 0.1 19.3 0.7
Georgia 5,767 1.4 735 0.3 631 1.7 10.6 0.2 15.3 0.1 15.2 0.3
Hawaii 132 - 1 - 5 - 47.5 - 27.7 - 26.8 -
Idaho S S 15 - 36 0.1 S S 44.5 - 44.4 -
Illinois 10,759 2.5 2,114 0.9 1,762 4.8 13.5 0.2 36.2 0.3 35 1.4
Indiana 4,104 1 759 0.3 562 1.5 12.9 0.1 41.7 0.1 43.7 0.4
Iowa 1,701 0.4 195 0.1 214 0.6 16.9 0.1 20 - 20.2 0.2
Kansas 1,107 0.3 153 0.1 204 0.6 22.4 0.1 17.2 - 19.3 0.1
Kentucky 4,089 1 332 0.1 238 0.6 26.6 0.2 14.7 - 13.8 0.1
Louisiana 1,340 0.3 171 0.1 240 0.6 22.3 0.1 33.9 - 34 0.2
Maine 1,207 0.3 415 0.2 183 0.5 16.3 - 21 - 20.3 0.1
Maryland 22,252 5.3 3,501 1.5 657 1.8 31.9 1.2 17.8 0.3 22.5 0.4
Massachusetts 8,873 2.1 2,507 1.1 638 1.7 15.2 0.3 11.1 0.1 12 0.2
Michigan 7,304 1.7 1,349 0.6 988 2.7 32.8 0.5 25.5 0.1 26.6 0.4
Minnesota 1,837 0.4 256 0.1 316 0.9 15.3 0.1 28 - 28.1 0.2
Mississippi 826 0.2 119 0.1 137 0.4 25.5 0.1 26.7 - 26.7 0.1
Missouri 3,350 0.8 340 0.1 362 1 26.1 0.2 17.4 - 18.6 0.3
Montana 434 0.1 25 - 60 0.2 29.4 - 18.2 - 18 -
Nebraska 779 0.2 89 - 115 0.3 19.5 - 21.9 - 21.5 0.1
Nevada 1,561 0.4 61 - 158 0.4 26.7 0.1 16.7 - 16.5 0.1
New Hampshire 1,471 0.3 453 0.2 147 0.4 28.6 0.1 17.9 - 18.3 0.1
New Jersey 125,828 29.8 133,318 57.9 3,139 8.5 7.3 1.6 11 3.5 8.7 0.7
New Mexico 314 0.1 S S S S 24.2 - S S S S
New York 64,156 15.2 32,630 14.2 2,800 7.6 8 1.1 12.4 1.9 10.8 1.3
North Carolina 7,214 1.7 1,620 0.7 943 2.5 20.4 0.2 23.2 0.2 25.1 0.6
North Dakota 269 0.1 8 - 12 - 28.4 - 37.8 - 37.9 -
Ohio 10,952 2.6 1,703 0.7 874 2.4 19.5 0.5 15.8 0.1 15.7 0.3
Oklahoma 783 0.2 S S S S 27.5 - S S S S
Oregon 935 0.2 90 - 290 0.8 14.6 - 20.6 - 26.1 0.2
Pennsylvania 41,251 9.8 25,772 11.2 1,691 4.6 11.4 0.9 16.7 1.9 9.9 0.6
Rhode Island 2,342 0.6 S S 291 0.8 27 0.1 S S 49.6 0.4
South Carolina 2,630 0.6 1,013 0.4 755 2 20.2 0.1 48.2 0.2 49.6 1
South Dakota 176 - 19 - S S 37.5 - 48.6 - S S
Tennessee 5,146 1.2 463 0.2 391 1.1 24.5 0.3 16.3 - 18 0.2
Texas 13,658 3.2 1,968 0.9 3,586 9.7 20.3 0.5 27.9 0.2 30.9 1.9
Utah 1,146 0.3 97 - 211 0.6 21.1 0.1 13.6 - 13.5 0.1
Vermont 544 0.1 298 0.1 S S 21 - 47.1 0.1 S S
Virginia 10,397 2.5 4,031 1.8 1,589 4.3 15.5 0.5 21.6 0.4 33.9 1.6
Washington 2,164 0.5 S S S S 15.3 0.1 S S S S
West Virginia 882 0.2 S S S S 14.3 - S S S S
Wisconsin 2,878 0.7 366 0.2 348 0.9 13.6 0.1 16.9 - 16.8 0.2
Wyoming 50 - S S S S 48.7 - S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.