Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 489,415 100 500,393 100 88,690 100 6.5 - 9.4 - 6 -
Alabama 4,114 0.8 897 0.2 810 0.9 25.4 0.2 20.8 - 22.5 0.2
Alaska 170 - S S S S 33.9 - S S S S
Arizona 4,000 0.8 439 0.1 1,011 1.1 47.9 0.3 40.2 - 39.3 0.4
Arkansas 1,979 0.4 S S S S 43.5 0.2 S S S S
California 17,046 3.5 2,656 0.5 7,165 8.1 17.3 0.4 12.3 0.1 13.2 1
Colorado 2,728 0.6 539 0.1 990 1.1 32.2 0.1 42 - 45.9 0.4
Connecticut 5,508 1.1 1,886 0.4 458 0.5 11.3 0.1 24.9 0.1 18.6 0.1
Delaware 8,383 1.7 19,342 3.9 1,239 1.4 35.5 0.6 46.4 1.2 36.9 0.5
District of Columbia 771 0.2 280 0.1 41 - 21.2 - 32.5 - 26 -
Florida 11,754 2.4 1,996 0.4 2,187 2.5 19.3 0.3 12.7 - 13.2 0.3
Georgia 8,263 1.7 2,802 0.6 2,184 2.5 18.9 0.2 6.9 - 6.6 0.2
Hawaii S S 18 - 118 0.1 S S 46 - 46 0.1
Idaho 359 0.1 40 - 89 0.1 14.8 - 28.9 - 28.7 -
Illinois 12,852 2.6 3,838 0.8 2,514 2.8 10.5 0.3 7.2 0.1 7.5 0.3
Indiana 7,353 1.5 2,531 0.5 1,252 1.4 8.7 0.2 9.6 0.1 10.1 0.2
Iowa 1,839 0.4 321 0.1 288 0.3 17.5 0.1 14.1 - 12.9 -
Kansas 1,992 0.4 612 0.1 655 0.7 15.3 0.1 23.2 - 22.6 0.2
Kentucky 4,589 0.9 1,289 0.3 682 0.8 18.4 0.2 15.2 - 15.8 0.1
Louisiana 2,345 0.5 919 0.2 1,264 1.4 14.8 0.1 31.3 0.1 36 0.5
Maine 1,613 0.3 1,377 0.3 S S 7.1 - 48.7 0.2 S S
Maryland 19,992 4.1 22,000 4.4 3,830 4.3 9.5 0.3 35.3 1.2 46.7 1.6
Massachusetts 7,245 1.5 2,317 0.5 862 1 8.8 0.1 8.1 - 8.3 0.1
Michigan 8,440 1.7 3,774 0.8 1,820 2.1 6.6 0.1 24.2 0.3 26 0.6
Minnesota 3,171 0.6 712 0.1 836 0.9 8.6 0.1 12.8 - 11.2 0.1
Mississippi 1,335 0.3 366 0.1 393 0.4 21.1 - 18.5 - 19.2 0.1
Missouri 2,720 0.6 698 0.1 644 0.7 11.8 0.1 13 - 12.1 0.1
Montana 489 0.1 116 - 250 0.3 23 - 32.1 - 32.2 0.1
Nebraska 621 0.1 178 - 221 0.2 20.7 - 36.5 - 40.6 0.1
Nevada 2,512 0.5 327 0.1 808 0.9 38.3 0.1 44.5 - 44 0.3
New Hampshire 1,609 0.3 599 0.1 269 0.3 9.4 - 12.2 - 12.8 -
New Jersey 39,509 8.1 46,285 9.2 5,422 6.1 18.9 0.9 29 2 30.4 1.5
New Mexico 884 0.2 62 - 121 0.1 29.2 0.1 39.3 - 40 0.1
New York 38,785 7.9 21,045 4.2 5,372 6.1 7.6 0.6 11.8 0.5 18.3 1.2
North Carolina 10,700 2.2 4,361 0.9 2,115 2.4 30.4 0.5 31.6 0.2 29.1 0.7
North Dakota 337 0.1 70 - 96 0.1 20.5 - 27.9 - 28.3 -
Ohio 27,208 5.6 18,657 3.7 5,775 6.5 10.4 0.5 17.1 0.9 28.1 1.9
Oklahoma 1,289 0.3 345 0.1 424 0.5 27.8 0.1 20.5 - 20.4 0.1
Oregon 2,101 0.4 405 0.1 1,174 1.3 33.7 0.1 19.3 - 20.3 0.2
Pennsylvania 165,795 33.9 310,561 62.1 14,335 16.2 7.2 1.7 7.7 2.5 8 1.5
Rhode Island 1,283 0.3 395 0.1 127 0.1 16.5 0.1 33.3 - 30.5 -
South Carolina 3,182 0.7 S S S S 9 - S S S S
South Dakota 346 0.1 S S 92 0.1 33.8 - S S 48.2 0.1
Tennessee 5,811 1.2 2,732 0.5 S S 22.9 0.2 38.4 0.3 S S
Texas 18,943 3.9 3,324 0.7 5,394 6.1 17 0.5 9.9 0.1 9.5 0.5
Utah 2,115 0.4 301 0.1 623 0.7 38.7 0.1 28.9 - 31 0.2
Vermont 823 0.2 318 0.1 158 0.2 14.2 - 17.6 - 22.4 -
Virginia 11,979 2.4 6,350 1.3 1,675 1.9 8.8 0.2 19.1 0.2 18.9 0.4
Washington 2,820 0.6 328 0.1 913 1 26.6 0.1 29.4 - 30.4 0.3
West Virginia 4,975 1 3,970 0.8 782 0.9 10.7 0.1 24.9 0.3 35 0.3
Wisconsin 4,152 0.8 1,442 0.3 1,101 1.2 7.1 0.1 17.8 0.1 15.8 0.2
Wyoming 254 0.1 27 - 47 0.1 27.3 - 42.9 - 43.7 -

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.