Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Table 7. Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Destination Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 194,444 100 246,958 100 50,629 100 4 - 10.1 - 18.9 -
Alabama 2,093 1.1 1,025 0.4 660 1.3 28.1 0.3 17.9 0.1 19.6 0.2
Alaska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Arizona 1,056 0.5 210 0.1 474 0.9 16.8 0.1 43.6 - 44 0.4
Arkansas 824 0.4 257 0.1 268 0.5 18.4 0.1 20.7 - 21.9 0.1
California 5,008 2.6 824 0.3 2,241 4.4 10 0.2 13 - 13.3 0.8
Colorado 802 0.4 110 - 196 0.4 20.4 0.1 43 - 44.5 0.3
Connecticut 774 0.4 379 0.2 188 0.4 13.6 0.1 33.8 0.1 32.3 0.1
Delaware 1,250 0.6 590 0.2 139 0.3 24 0.2 17.9 0.1 19.1 0.1
District of Columbia 1,794 0.9 3,813 1.5 125 0.2 12.7 0.1 44 0.6 27.4 0.1
Florida 5,198 2.7 3,187 1.3 2,647 5.2 10.7 0.3 27.2 0.4 27.6 1.7
Georgia 5,323 2.7 14,170 5.7 6,405 12.7 9.1 0.2 46.3 1.7 46.1 3.2
Hawaii S S S S S S S S S S S S
Idaho 546 0.3 16 - 40 0.1 48.3 0.1 45.7 - 45.8 0.1
Illinois 4,456 2.3 S S 2,440 4.8 14.9 0.2 S S 46.4 1.5
Indiana 2,322 1.2 982 0.4 624 1.2 23.6 0.2 18.8 0.1 20.3 0.3
Iowa 638 0.3 253 0.1 299 0.6 18.7 0.1 32.5 - 34.4 0.3
Kansas 729 0.4 236 0.1 295 0.6 19.6 0.1 35.6 - 38.3 0.1
Kentucky 3,028 1.6 1,322 0.5 446 0.9 21.3 0.3 11.3 0.1 13.4 0.2
Louisiana 1,224 0.6 651 0.3 700 1.4 20.2 0.1 36.8 0.1 37.5 0.5
Maine 342 0.2 91 - 81 0.2 14.4 - 25.6 - 26.8 -
Maryland 12,536 6.4 9,574 3.9 1,164 2.3 11.4 0.9 21.7 0.8 26.5 1.1
Massachusetts 1,656 0.9 808 0.3 476 0.9 16 0.1 33.5 0.1 33 0.2
Michigan 2,441 1.3 927 0.4 633 1.3 13.7 0.1 21 0.1 19.1 0.3
Minnesota 773 0.4 415 0.2 536 1.1 16.8 0.1 41.8 - 42.3 0.2
Mississippi 651 0.3 292 0.1 266 0.5 16.7 0.1 32 - 32.7 0.2
Missouri 1,672 0.9 561 0.2 577 1.1 24.3 0.1 30.1 0.1 32.8 0.3
Montana 243 0.1 31 - 74 0.1 28.2 - 27.6 - 27.1 0.1
Nebraska 375 0.2 88 - 121 0.2 27.6 0.1 34 - 34.1 0.1
Nevada 477 0.2 61 - 145 0.3 38 0.1 26.1 - 25.1 0.1
New Hampshire 370 0.2 200 0.1 133 0.3 15.8 - 25.7 - 25.1 0.1
New Jersey 4,480 2.3 2,118 0.9 778 1.5 6.5 0.1 15 0.1 16.2 0.3
New Mexico S S 13 - 24 - S S 35.4 - 36.7 -
New York 5,921 3 2,289 0.9 1,182 2.3 7.1 0.2 15.1 0.1 13.7 0.4
North Carolina 10,785 5.5 11,625 4.7 2,539 5 7 0.4 13.5 0.8 15.2 1.7
North Dakota 173 0.1 38 - 61 0.1 21.3 - 28.7 - 27.8 -
Ohio 4,752 2.4 2,928 1.2 1,347 2.7 6.9 0.2 13.2 0.1 15.7 0.4
Oklahoma 454 0.2 152 0.1 169 0.3 20.4 0.1 22 - 20.9 0.1
Oregon 396 0.2 63 - 189 0.4 10.9 - 17.5 - 18.9 0.1
Pennsylvania 6,655 3.4 4,364 1.8 1,289 2.5 7.8 0.3 7.8 0.1 7.8 0.3
Rhode Island S S 83 - 48 0.1 S S 24.1 - 25.3 -
South Carolina 3,206 1.6 1,244 0.5 426 0.8 25.6 0.4 15.4 0.1 15.8 0.2
South Dakota 80 - S S S S 35.7 - S S S S
Tennessee 4,270 2.2 7,308 3 1,254 2.5 16.5 0.3 38.4 1.2 25.1 0.7
Texas 6,229 3.2 1,496 0.6 2,101 4.1 9.3 0.4 12.5 0.1 12.9 0.7
Utah 522 0.3 146 0.1 308 0.6 22.1 0.1 39.7 - 39 0.4
Vermont 135 0.1 58 - 45 0.1 37.8 - 39.3 - 41.6 -
Virginia 79,854 41.1 164,144 66.5 14,930 29.5 6.6 2.3 10.5 1.9 38.7 4
Washington 1,038 0.5 93 - 265 0.5 12.2 0.1 18.7 - 19.3 0.1
West Virginia 3,498 1.8 3,768 1.5 678 1.3 14.6 0.3 21.5 0.4 23.3 0.4
Wisconsin 1,428 0.7 486 0.2 465 0.9 5.7 - 16.7 - 17 0.2
Wyoming 61 - S S S S 39.6 - S S S S

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.