Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Table 8. Inbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Origin for State of Destination: 2007

Estimates are based on the 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive.

Excel | CSV

State of Origin Value Tons Ton-miles1 Value Tons Ton-miles
2007
(million $)
Percent of total 2007
(thousands)
Percent of total 2007
(millions)
Percent of
total
CV2 Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
CV Standard
Error of %
All States 236,320 100 241,157 100 101,671 100 3.4 - 7.5 - 9.9 -
Alabama 1,103 0.5 1,128 0.5 1,071 1.1 7.5 - 12.9 0.1 12.1 0.2
Alaska S S S S S S S S S S S S
Arizona 1,722 0.7 113 - 221 0.2 37.5 0.3 40.3 - 41.1 0.1
Arkansas 881 0.4 696 0.3 648 0.6 14.7 0.1 29.1 0.1 33.3 0.2
California 7,559 3.2 1,356 0.6 2,904 2.9 12.6 0.4 24 0.1 23.3 0.7
Colorado 798 0.3 S S S S 49.2 0.1 S S S S
Connecticut 767 0.3 170 0.1 195 0.2 14.4 0.1 33.6 - 33.7 -
Delaware 101 - 26 - 24 - 19 - 23 - 22.9 -
District of Columbia S S S S - - S S S S 49.8 -
Florida 1,772 0.7 655 0.3 991 1 20.1 0.2 31.2 0.1 33.8 0.2
Georgia 2,083 0.9 1,094 0.5 1,151 1.1 14.3 0.1 11.4 0.1 10.7 0.2
Hawaii 1 - - - - - 31.5 - 43.4 - 46.1 -
Idaho 697 0.3 267 0.1 430 0.4 20.6 0.1 15.1 - 14.6 0.1
Illinois 37,428 15.8 15,704 6.5 2,827 2.8 15.4 1.8 10.4 0.8 9.9 0.5
Indiana 6,508 2.8 4,971 2.1 1,470 1.4 8.7 0.3 13.7 0.3 12.7 0.2
Iowa 3,956 1.7 3,047 1.3 945 0.9 13.4 0.2 7.7 0.2 9.8 0.2
Kansas 1,485 0.6 400 0.2 278 0.3 11.7 0.1 15.5 - 15.5 0.1
Kentucky 2,208 0.9 926 0.4 527 0.5 16.3 0.2 22.5 0.1 24.5 0.3
Louisiana 934 0.4 853 0.4 952 0.9 13.1 0.1 22.9 0.1 22.7 0.3
Maine 407 0.2 317 0.1 436 0.4 20.8 - 25.5 - 24.7 0.1
Maryland 445 0.2 130 0.1 112 0.1 17.8 - 24 - 24.5 -
Massachusetts 1,693 0.7 170 0.1 193 0.2 16.4 0.1 22.1 - 22.1 -
Michigan 6,886 2.9 5,227 2.2 1,761 1.7 7.9 0.3 8.7 0.3 8 0.3
Minnesota 13,658 5.8 27,432 11.4 4,618 4.5 7.5 0.5 37.9 3.3 24.6 1.3
Mississippi 883 0.4 309 0.1 293 0.3 28.4 0.1 19.5 - 19.1 0.1
Missouri 2,163 0.9 1,228 0.5 681 0.7 7.7 0.1 16.2 0.1 17.9 0.2
Montana 199 0.1 11,183 4.6 17,365 17.1 25.4 - 41.1 1.8 29.2 4.9
Nebraska 1,825 0.8 672 0.3 405 0.4 16.6 0.1 20.5 0.1 19.9 0.1
Nevada 228 0.1 10 - 18 - 26 - 28.8 - 29.1 -
New Hampshire 297 0.1 35 - 42 - 15.6 - 20.9 - 21 -
New Jersey 2,878 1.2 366 0.2 348 0.3 13.6 0.2 16.9 - 16.8 0.1
New Mexico 218 0.1 65 - 92 0.1 35.2 - 37.6 - 37.3 -
New York 5,457 2.3 909 0.4 782 0.8 15.9 0.4 8.7 - 8.8 0.1
North Carolina 2,362 1 639 0.3 626 0.6 8.5 0.1 8 - 8.8 0.1
North Dakota 850 0.4 S S S S 39.6 0.2 S S S S
Ohio 8,670 3.7 3,028 1.3 1,530 1.5 6.3 0.2 9.3 0.2 10.4 0.3
Oklahoma 732 0.3 365 0.2 334 0.3 18.2 - 15.2 - 15.4 0.1
Oregon 815 0.3 321 0.1 680 0.7 18 0.1 21.9 - 21.1 0.2
Pennsylvania 4,152 1.8 1,442 0.6 1,101 1.1 7.1 0.2 17.8 0.1 15.8 0.2
Rhode Island 182 0.1 26 - 29 - 12.5 - 30.7 - 31.1 -
South Carolina 1,698 0.7 475 0.2 505 0.5 19.4 0.1 10.1 - 10.7 0.1
South Dakota 780 0.3 S S S S 19.6 0.1 S S S S
Tennessee 8,015 3.4 859 0.4 614 0.6 39.8 1 15.4 0.1 16.1 0.1
Texas 5,096 2.2 2,323 1 3,066 3 15.4 0.3 33.9 0.2 34.8 0.6
Utah 606 0.3 1,062 0.4 S S 32.5 0.1 49.6 0.4 S S
Vermont 175 0.1 S S S S 19.2 - S S S S
Virginia 1,428 0.6 486 0.2 465 0.5 5.7 0.1 16.7 - 17 0.2
Washington 1,151 0.5 258 0.1 513 0.5 19.6 0.1 16.3 - 16.7 0.1
West Virginia 451 0.2 198 0.1 123 0.1 37 0.1 29.3 - 27.8 0.1
Wisconsin 91,533 38.7 114,255 47.4 6,251 6.1 4.8 1.7 12 2.8 15.5 1.2
Wyoming 384 0.2 30,058 12.5 36,698 36.1 17.4 - 17.9 2.2 17.7 5.5

KEY: S = Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling variability or poor response quality. - = Zero or Less than half the unit shown; thus, it has been rounded to zero.

1 Ton-miles estimates are based on estimated distances traveled along a modeled transportation network.
2 Coefficient of Variation.

NOTES: Value-of-shipments estimates have not been adjusted for price changes. Estimated measures of sampling variability for each estimate known as coefficients of variation (CV) are also provided in these tables. More information on sampling error, confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions may be found at http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 Economic Census: Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, December 2009.