TABLE 6 A Sample Conditional Probability Table (Version 3)
TABLE 6 A Sample Conditional Probability Table (Version 3)
| Land uses | Mode choices | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % medium residential | % high residential | % commercial | % other land uses | Probability motorized trip | Probability nonmotorized trip | Probability transit trip |
| 10 | 10 | 20 | 60 | 90 | 5 | 5 |
| 10 | 10 | 40 | 10 | 52 | 16 | 33 |
| 10 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 69 | 18 | 13 |
| 10 | 80 | 10 | 0 | 62 | 8 | 30 |
| 20 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 78 | 11 | 11 |
| 30 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 78 | 11 | 11 |
| 10 | 20 | 50 | 10 | 53 | 14 | 33 |
| 10 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 53 | 14 | 33 |
| 10 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 63 | 7 | 30 |
| 20 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 78 | 10 | 12 |
| 10 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 52 | 15 | 33 |
Notes: Notice how a small mix of uses has high probabilities of transit and nonmotorized trips. The same happens with extremely high percentages of residential densities. Could this be the quantitative proof about land-use mixes?