Table 1-5: Alabama Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: Alabama Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 601 599 600 601 601 600
Very good 521 67 75 94 228 229
Good 63 373 367 348 260 258
Fair 7 96 95 95 73 73
Mediocre 6 63 63 64 37 37
Poor 4 0 0 0 3 3
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 2,059 2,066 2,072 2,075 2,073 2,083
Very good 633 45 91 157 517 522
Good 899 1,129 1,122 1,113 1,175 1,181
Fair 492 877 844 790 370 369
Mediocre 10 8 8 8 11 11
Poor 25 7 7 7 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 3,685 3,704 3,702 3,694 3,693 3,691
Very good 938 76 228 406 486 499
Good 1,313 1,464 1,433 1,393 2,100 2,079
Fair 1,434 2,112 2,004 1,857 1,107 1,113
Mediocre 0 52 37 38 0 0
Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 700
Very good N N N N N 44
Good N N N N N 245
Fair N N N N N 163
Mediocre N N N N N 248
Poor N N N N N 0
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE:In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition.  A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting. 

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.