Table 1-4: Arkansas Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-4: Arkansas Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 140 135 138 147 143 188
Very good 1 4 4 2 2 3
Good 10 9 9 14 13 34
Fair 31 25 24 34 31 33
Mediocre 62 63 65 52 60 80
Poor 36 34 36 45 37 38
Not reported 4 6 12 1 4 1
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 40 104 95 110 103 84
Very good 0 4 6 1 4 1
Good 8 22 26 46 36 21
Fair 26 49 40 46 43 47
Mediocre 5 25 20 12 13 12
Poor 1 4 3 5 7 3
Not reported 62 8 12 3 21 3
Other principal arterial (total reported) 33 495 471 517 489 509
Very good 0 1 0 0 0 0
Good 1 64 58 59 57 36
Fair 19 288 277 298 290 304
Mediocre 6 75 72 86 74 97
Poor 7 67 64 74 68 72
Not reported 544 85 108 62 89 74
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N 360
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 33
Fair N N N N N 235
Mediocre N N N N N 50
Poor N N N N N 42
Not reported N N N N N N
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N 23
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 0
Fair N N N N N 5
Mediocre N N N N N 2
Poor N N N N N 16
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.