Table 1-6: California Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-6: California Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 914 1,079 1,067 1,070 1,093 1,095
Very good 11 21 24 24 24 32
Good 194 146 146 146 169 184
Fair 215 190 195 201 214 160
Mediocre 362 557 519 516 503 494
Poor 132 165 183 183 183 225
Not reported 162 0 0 0 1 1
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 1,073 1,334 1,396 1,396 1,374 1,320
Very good 45 26 39 38 42 13
Good 257 237 242 242 219 190
Fair 676 946 956 957 954 916
Mediocre 83 104 133 133 133 138
Poor 12 21 26 26 26 63
Not reported 255 0 2 0 0 24
Other principal arterial (total reported) 3,170 5,854 5,835 5,842 5,829 5,886
Very good 319 724 548 89 91 23
Good 601 1,029 731 275 273 200
Fair 1,597 3,293 3,355 2,521 2,508 2,640
Mediocre 430 446 724 1,733 1,732 1,869
Poor 223 362 477 1,224 1,225 1,154
Not reported 2,690 0 1 1 3 53
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N   N   N   N   N   10,267
Very good N   N   N   N   N   48
Good N   N   N   N   N   244
Fair N   N   N   N   N   3,743
Mediocre N   N   N   N   N   3,449
Poor N   N   N   N   N   2,783
Not reported N   N   N   N   N   0
Urban collector (total reported) N   N   N   N   N   9,671
Very good N   N   N   N   N   39
Good N   N   N   N   N   109
Fair N   N   N   N   N   2,262
Mediocre N   N   N   N   N   2,956
Poor N   N   N   N   N   4,305
Not reported N   N   N   N   N   0

KEY: N = Data do not exist

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Servicability Rating.