Table 1-4: Connecticut Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-4: Connecticut Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 98 101 102 102 102 100
Very good 0 0 0 1 0 1
Good 43 0 55 66 58 80
Fair 13 52 22 15 20 13
Mediocre 29 40 20 17 19 5
Poor 13 9 5 3 5 1
Not reported 3 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 262 258 263 263 263 263
Very good 0 0 0 3 0 0
Good 95 48 51 58 54 71
Fair 137 180 195 184 188 178
Mediocre 28 25 14 15 20 12
Poor 2 5 3 3 1 2
Not reported 2 5 0 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 409 462 499 499 497 495
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 1 2 12 3 51
Fair 162 351 450 430 458 418
Mediocre 163 93 27 45 28 26
Poor 84 17 20 12 8 0
Not reported 89 36 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 1,156
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 26
Fair N N N N N 792
Mediocre N N N N N 211
Poor N N N N N 127
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.