Table 1-5: Delaware Road Condition by Functional System - Rural

Table 1-5: Delaware Road Condition by Functional System - Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mediocre 0 0 0 0 0 0
Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 216 216 218 218 215 199
Very good 0 1 5 5 5 6
Good 49 49 88 88 88 83
Fair 124 123 116 116 114 103
Mediocre 25 25 7 7 7 6
Poor 18 18 2 2 1 1
Not reported 0 0 0 0 9 11
Minor arterial (total reported) 105 105 105 105 110 122
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 46 45 53 51 50 59
Fair 47 45 39 40 45 48
Mediocre 8 11 9 11 11 11
Poor 4 4 4 3 4 4
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 554
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 219
Fair N N N N N 228
Mediocre N N N N N 70
Poor N N N N N 37
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.