Table 1-5: Florida Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: Florida Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 946 772 939 909 931 922
Very good 34 138 168 703 769 767
Good 268 227 265 70 70 66
Fair 298 171 182 45 16 16
Mediocre 342 233 324 91 73 68
Poor 4 3 0 0 3 5
Not reported 0 186 15 45 22 30
Other principal arterial (total reported) 3,443 3,297 3,623 3,632 3,646 3,600
Very good 91 94 199 1,615 1,681 1,680
Good 884 966 1,090 1,403 1,489 1,450
Fair 2,193 2,023 2,133 551 448 441
Mediocre 228 178 153 39 27 26
Poor 47 36 48 24 1 3
Not reported 0 421 99 86 71 112
Minor arterial (total reported) 2,838 2,318 2,358 2,340 2,357 2,584
Very good 61 69 85 575 834 753
Good 720 976 857 1,323 1,208 1,298
Fair 1,810 1,051 1,326 412 286 501
Mediocre 244 116 70 30 23 25
Poor 3 106 20 0 6 7
Not reported 0 268 217 242 242 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 721
Very good N N N N N 103
Good N N N N N 474
Fair N N N N N 144
Mediocre N N N N N 0
Poor N N N N N 0
Not reported N N N N N NA

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.