Table 1-3: Hawaii Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-3: Hawaii Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mediocre 0 0 0 0 0 0
Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 0 0 5 6 6 6
Other principal arterial (total reported) 6 6 5 0 0 0
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 3 3 2 0 0 0
Mediocre 3 3 3 0 0 0
Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 119 119 119 125 125 124
Minor arterial (total reported) 43 50 51 0 0 6
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 4 8 9 0 0 6
Mediocre 38 41 41 0 0 0
Poor 1 1 1 0 0 0
Not reported 333 324 324 375 376 370
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N N
Very good N N N N N N
Good N N N N N N
Fair N N N N N N
Mediocre N N N N N N
Poor N N N N N N
Not reported N N N N N N

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.