Table 1-4: Hawaii Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-4: Hawaii Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 3 3 3 0 0 0
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mediocre 2 2 2 0 0 0
Poor 1 1 1 0 0 0
Not reported 40 40 46 49 49 49
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 8 8 8 0 0 0
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 5 5 5 0 0 0
Mediocre 3 3 3 0 0 0
Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 26 26 25 34 34 34
Other principal arterial (total reported) 21 21 21 0 0 3
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fair 10 10 10 0 0 2
Mediocre 10 10 10 0 0 0
Poor 1 1 1 0 0 1
Not reported 114 114 116 138 137 135
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N 4
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 0
Fair N N N N N 1
Mediocre N N N N N 0
Poor N N N N N 3
Not reported N N N N N N
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N 7
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 0
Fair N N N N N 1
Mediocre N N N N N 2
Poor N N N N N 4
Not reported N N N N N N

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.