Table 1-4: Kansas Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-4: Kansas Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 698 696 699 698 698 694
Very good 44 156 223 254 201 262
Good 288 343 274 303 342 321
Fair 220 103 78 50 116 96
Mediocre 139 94 107 84 34 14
Poor 7 0 17 7 5 1
Not reported 0 2 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 3,167 3,092 3,059 3,102 3,127 3,138
Very good 179 612 552 715 710 882
Good 1,240 1,499 1,534 1,553 1,737 1,838
Fair 1,667 921 938 796 644 406
Mediocre 76 56 24 35 34 11
Poor 5 4 11 3 2 1
Not reported 0 79 116 70 43 24
Minor arterial (total reported) 4,301 4,278 4,263 4,286 4,295 4,305
Very good 118 167 189 1,120 1,052 990
Good 1,275 2,279 1,976 1,897 2,168 1,897
Fair 2,678 1,587 1,994 1,019 1,009 1,371
Mediocre 220 195 60 146 43 30
Poor 10 50 44 104 23 17
Not reported 0 23 44 7 1 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 2,361
Very good N N N N N 144
Good N N N N N 1,658
Fair N N N N N 544
Mediocre N N N N N 0
Poor N N N N N 15
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.