Table 1-5: Kansas Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-5: Kansas Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 174 169 171 171 172 175
Very good 2 17 13 20 7 5
Good 81 68 78 69 74 82
Fair 67 65 60 66 69 68
Mediocre 24 19 20 16 20 19
Poor 0 0 0 0 2 1
Not reported 0 5 4 3 2 2
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 129 111 116 122 127 126
Very good 7 3 10 14 14 18
Good 27 42 38 47 43 45
Fair 84 55 58 53 62 52
Mediocre 7 5 7 5 6 10
Poor 4 6 3 3 2 1
Not reported 7 30 18 13 9 9
Other principal arterial (total reported) 351 180 202 216 215 217
Very good 46 11 13 14 15 17
Good 41 48 54 65 57 75
Fair 198 98 98 102 95 95
Mediocre 27 16 29 29 36 19
Poor 39 7 8 6 12 11
Not reported 282 462 448 434 432 427
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N 92
Very good N N N N N 32
Good N N N N N 1
Fair N N N N N 13
Mediocre N N N N N 45
Poor N N N N N 1
Not reported N N N N N N
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N 17
Very good N N N N N 5
Good N N N N N 0
Fair N N N N N 12
Mediocre N N N N N 0
Poor N N N N N 0
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.