Table 1-5: Kentucky Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: Kentucky Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 536 536 536 535 536 533
Very good 10 173 163 131 133 196
Good 273 172 192 215 250 189
Fair 61 56 46 33 23 12
Mediocre 151 135 135 156 130 136
Poor 41 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 2,014 2,012 2,043 2,047 2,052 2,044
Very good 51 243 235 256 320 285
Good 754 1,174 1,290 1,248 1,143 1,158
Fair 571 328 300 254 335 322
Mediocre 570 259 211 270 244 260
Poor 68 8 7 19 10 19
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 1,607 1,621 1,605 1,608 1,608 1,602
Very good 0 53 53 1 1 0
Good 174 773 693 874 810 700
Fair 645 541 532 350 389 577
Mediocre 707 254 320 380 370 290
Poor 81 0 7 3 38 35
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 6,993
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 1,864
Fair N N N N N 5,117
Mediocre N N N N N 7
Poor N N N N N 5
Not reported N N N N N 0

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.