Table 1-5: Massachusetts Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: Massachusetts Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 162 162 161 161 162 162
Very good 0 0 5 3 0 0
Good 93 94 112 86 90 66
Fair 46 50 39 65 65 65
Mediocre 19 14 2 6 6 30
Poor 4 4 3 1 1 1
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 109 309 289 303 306 312
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 1
Good 18 71 101 97 56 46
Fair 78 205 165 184 224 232
Mediocre 12 25 18 20 23 29
Poor 1 8 5 2 3 4
Not reported 209 10 25 9 5 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 113 293 508 532 568 670
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 5 15 78 77 21 23
Fair 94 164 384 412 485 513
Mediocre 6 82 29 28 29 93
Poor 8 32 17 15 33 41
Not reported 551 372 164 137 103 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 413
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 16
Fair N N N N N 240
Mediocre N N N N N 153
Poor N N N N N 4
Not reported N N N N N 0

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.