Table 1-5: Minnesota Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-5: Minnesota Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 233 232 232 232 230 231
Very good 3 13 29 21 66 42
Good 6 114 125 113 105 125
Fair 56 51 50 51 41 45
Mediocre 101 48 27 41 16 19
Poor 67 6 1 6 2 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 1 0
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 128 142 142 144 145 142
Very good 0 10 12 11 26 21
Good 8 52 54 54 58 63
Fair 71 75 69 72 59 58
Mediocre 20 5 6 6 2 0
Poor 29 0 1 1 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 8
Other principal arterial (total reported) 546 558 551 534 556 521
Very good 0 17 60 55 89 65
Good 17 122 144 134 182 222
Fair 188 327 264 251 230 215
Mediocre 178 55 51 53 32 13
Poor 163 37 32 41 23 6
Not reported 0 0 0 0 1 35
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N 2,084
Very good N N N N N 102
Good N N N N N 659
Fair N N N N N 971
Mediocre N N N N N 230
Poor N N N N N 122
Not reported N N N N N N
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N 1,504
Very good N N N N N 13
Good N N N N N 223
Fair N N N N N 634
Mediocre N N N N N 215
Poor N N N N N 419
Not reported N N N N N 0

KEY: N = Data do not exist

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.