Table 1-3: Mississippi Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-3: Mississippi Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 558 558 559 557 558 558
Very good 11 11 12 12 85 85
Good 201 232 223 212 230 236
Fair 160 141 147 152 114 108
Mediocre 142 144 144 152 102 102
Poor 44 30 33 29 27 27
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 1,793 1,839 1,831 1,850 1,903 1,856
Very good 5 28 15 15 168 169
Good 511 647 660 625 882 874
Fair 1,117 1,111 1,102 1,134 808 774
Mediocre 110 48 52 63 36 31
Poor 50 5 2 13 9 8
Not reported 2 0 0 0 0 43
Minor arterial (total reported) 3,920 3,910 3,915 3,918 3,869 3,834
Very good 0 6 0 0 5 21
Good 991 1,042 1,194 1,259 1,309 1,195
Fair 2,355 2,713 2,627 2,560 2,410 2,475
Mediocre 285 141 75 83 144 142
Poor 289 8 19 16 1 1
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 4,751
Very good N N N N N 143
Good N N N N N 220
Fair N N N N N 682
Mediocre N N N N N 1,223
Poor N N N N N 2,483
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.