H - Data Sources

H - Data Sources

Airline freight and passenger data

The U.S. Department of Transportations (USDOT) Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) collects and compiles data on the volume of revenue passengers, freight, and mail traffic handled and reported by the nations large certificated air carriers. These carriers hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPN) issued by the USDOT authorizing the performance of air transportation. Large certificated air carriers operate aircraft with seating capacity of more than 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of more than 18,000 pounds or conduct international operations. Data for commuters, intrastate, nonscheduled air taxi operators, and foreign flag air carriers are not included in this BTS data.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Airline Information

Print source: USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Airline Information. Airport Activity Statistics. Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.bts.gov

Commodity Flow Survey

The Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) provides data on the movement of freight by type of commodity shipped and by mode of transport. In 1997, 100,000 domestic establishments were randomly selected from a universe of approximately 800,000 engaged in mining, manufacturing, wholesale, warehouses of multi-establishment companies, and some selected activities in retail and service. The survey excluded establishments classified as farms, forestry, fisheries, governments, construction, transportation, foreign establishments, services, and most establishments in retail. For the 1997 CFS, each selected establishment reported a sample of about 25 outbound shipments for a one-week period in each of four calendar quarters in 1997. This produced a total sample of over 5 million shipments. Due to industry-wide reporting problems, shipments by oil and gas extraction establishments were excluded from data tabulations.

For each sampled 1997 CFS shipment, zip code of origin and destination, 5-digit Standard Classification of Transported Goods (SCTG) code, weight, value, and modes of transport were provided. Information on whether the shipment was containerized, a hazardous material, or an export was also obtained. Route-distance for each mode, for each shipment, is imputed from a Mode-Distance Table developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Distance was used to compute ton-mileage by mode of transport. The CFS provides nationwide geographic coverage in 89 National Transportation Analysis Regions, stratified by state and, for the 1997 CFS, metropolitan area.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Statistical Programs

Print source: USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, [state]: 1997 Commodity Flow Survey. EC97TCF-[state], Washington, DC: 1999.

Internet: http://www.bts.gov/ntda/cfs/

Commuting data

Commuting data are derived from the Census 2000 Supplementary Survey (C2SS). The C2SS used the questionnaire and methods developed for the American Community Survey to collect demographic, social, economic, and housing data from a national sample of 700,000 households. Group quarters were not included in the sample. The C2SS was conducted in 1,203 counties with monthly samples of about 58,000 housing units. Economic, demographic, and housing characteristics from the Census 2000 Supplementary Survey are reported for the United States as a whole, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia.

The Census 2000 Supplementary Survey is not directly comparable with the 1990 Census for several reasons, one being that the former did not include group quarters. This may understate some categories such as walking.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, Demographic Surveys Division

Internet: http://www.census.gov

Gas and hazardous liquid pipeline data

U.S. fatality and injury data for natural gas pipelines and hazardous liquid pipelines are based on reports filed with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) under 49 CFR 191. Accidents must be reported as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after discovery. Undetected releases are a possible source of error; even if subsequently detected and reported, it may not be possible to accurately reconstruct the accident. Property damage figures are estimates.

Gas pipeline incidents involve: 1) releases of gas from a pipeline or liquefied natural gas (LNG) or gas from an LNG facility that results in a) death or personal injury necessitating in-patient hospitalization, or b) estimated property damage, including cost of gas lost, of the operator or others, or both, of $50,000 or more; 2) an event that results in an emergency shutdown of an LNG facility; or 3) an event that is significant, in the judgment of the operator, even though it did not meet the criteria of 1) or 2).

For hazardous liquids pipelines, an accident report is required for each failure in a pipeline system in which there is a release of the hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide transported resulting in any of the following: 1) explosion or fire not intentionally set by the operator; 2) loss of 50 or more barrels (8 or more cubic meters) of hazardous liquid or carbon dioxide; 3) escape to the atmosphere of more than 5 barrels (0.8 cubic meters) a day of highly volatile liquids; 4) death of any person; 5) bodily harm to any person resulting in one or more of the following: a) loss of consciousness, b) an individual being carried from the scene, c) medical treatment, or d) disability which prevents the discharge of normal duties or the pursuit of normal activities beyond the day of the accident; or 6) estimated property damage, including cost of clean-up and recovery, value of lost product, and damage to the property of the operator or others, or both, exceeding $50,000.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety

Internet: http://ops.dot.gov

Government transportation revenue and expenditure data

The U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC), U.S. Census Bureau conducts an Annual Survey of Government Finances. Alternatively, every five years, in years ending in a 2 or 7, a Census of Governments, including a finance portion, is conducted. The survey coverage includes all state and local governments in the United States. For both the Census and annual survey, the finance detail data is equivalent, encompassing the entire range of government finance activitiesrevenue, expenditure, debt, and assets.

The data collection for the annual survey uses two methods: mail canvas and central collection from state sources. Data for local governments includes county, municipal, township, special district, and school district data. Data for state governments are compiled from state government audits, budgets, and other financial reports into the classification categories used for reporting by the Census Bureau.

Reporting of government finances by the Census Bureau involves presentation of data in terms of uniform categories. While often similar to, or identical to, the classification used by the state or local government, there could be instances in which a significant difference exists between the name of a state or local financial item and the final category to which it is assigned by the Census Bureau.

Like financial transactions are combined. The financial categories for revenue involve grouping of items by source. Revenue items of the same kind are merged. Financial transactions for expenditures are classified both by function and by object category. Debt items are classified by term (short- and long-term), as well as by type of debt and, to a limited extent, by purpose. Assets also are put into uniform categories, grouped by type of holding, with holdings for insurance trust systems grouped separately from general government.

The share of government sector financial totals contributed by a state government or by local governments differs materially from one state to another. Users can review the Government Finance and Employment Classification Manual for additional information regarding the financial categories. The financial amounts in the tables and files are statistical in nature and do not represent accounting statements or conditions.

The local government statistics are developed from a sample survey. Therefore, the local totals, as well as state and local aggregates, are considered estimated amounts subject to sampling error. State government finance data are not subject to sampling. Consequently, state-local aggregates for individual states are more reliable (on a relative standard error basis) than the local government estimates they include.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, Finance Branch

Print Sources: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, Federal Aid to States: 2000

Internet: http://www.census.gov

Hazardous materials incidents data

Incidents resulting in certain unintentional releases of hazardous materials must be reported under 49 CFR 171.16. Each carrier must submit a report to the USDOT, Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) within 30 days of the incident, including information on the mode of transportation involved, results of the incident, and a narrative description of the accident. These reports are generally made available on RSPAs incident database within 90 days of receipt.

Fatalities and injuries are counted only if directly caused by a hazardous material. For example, a truck operator killed by impact forces during a motor vehicle crash would not be counted as a hazardous-material fatality. RSPA contacts the submitting carrier by telephone to verify all reported fatalities.

Although RSPA acknowledges that there is some level of underreporting, it believes that the underreporting is mostly limited to small, nonserious incidents. The reporting requirements were extended to intrastate highway carriers on October 1, 1998, and the response rate from this new group is expected to increase over time. Property damage figures are estimates determined by the carrier prior to the 30-day reporting deadline, and are generally not subsequently updated. Property damage figures, therefore, may underestimate actual damages.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of Hazardous Materials Planning and Analysis

Print source: USDOT, Research and Special Programs Administration, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Hazmat Summary by State for Calendar Year 2000. Washington, DC: 2001

Internet: http://hazmat.dot.gov

Highway mileage, condition, and use, driver licenses, and highway vehicle registrations data

Data on roadway mileage, condition, and use are extracted from the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), which uses a stratified simple random sample of highway links (small sections of roadway) selected from state inventory files. The HPMS sample was designed as a fixed sample to minimize data collection costs, but adjustments to maintain representativeness are carried out periodically. The HPMS also consists of universe reporting (a complete census) for the Interstate and the National Highway System, and tabular summary reporting of limited information.

Data are collected independently by the 50 states, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and lower jurisdictions. Many of the geometric data items rarely change, such as number of lanes; others change frequently, such as traffic. The U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides guidelines for data collection in the HPMS Field Manual, which the states follow to varying extents depending on matters such as staff, resources, state perspective, uses of the data, and state/MPO/local needs for the data. State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) report HPMS data annually to the FHWA.

HPMS data are subject to sampling and nonsampling error. Nonsampling error is the major concern with these data. For some of the most variable and important data items, such as traffic, guidelines for measurement and data collection have been produced. States have the option of using the guidelines or using their own procedures. Many data items are difficult and costly to collect and are reported as estimates not based on direct measurement. The data are collected and reported by many entities and individuals within the responsible organizations. Most do a reasonably good job, but staff turnover, cost, equipment issues, etc., can create difficulties.

States provide vehicle registration data to the FHWA. Vehicle registration data are shown on a calendar-year basis. Efforts are made to exclude transfers, re-registrations, and any other factors that could result in duplication in the vehicle counts. Registration practices for commercial vehicles differ greatly among the states. Some states register a tractor-semitrailer combination as a single unit; others register the tractor and the semitrailer separately. Some states register buses with trucks or automobiles, while many states do not report house and light utility trailers separately from commercial trailers or semitrailers. Some states do not require registration of car or light utility trailers. In some instances, FHWA has supplemented the data supplied by the states with information obtained from other sources.

States also provide driver licensing data to the FHWA. Although efforts are made to minimize license duplication, drivers who move from one state to another are sometimes counted in both states until the license from the previous state of residence expires. Problems with the data also arise from the fact that: 1) some individuals obtain their drivers licenses in states other than those of legal residence; 2) some individuals fraudulently obtain multiple licenses; 3) not all individuals who drive are licensed; and 4) the purging of expired licenses or licenses from deceased individuals is not performed on a continual basis.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information

Print source: USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics. Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/index.html

Highway safety data

Fatalities: Highway fatality data are extracted from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), which is compiled by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Data are gathered from a census of police accident reports (PARs), state vehicle registration files, state drivers licensing files, state highway department data, vital statistics, death certificates, coroner/medical examiner reports, hospital medical reports, and emergency medical service reports. A separate form is completed for each fatal crash. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is estimated when not known. Statistical procedures used for unknown data in FARS can be found in the NHTSA report, A Method for Estimating Posterior BAC Distributions for Persons Involved in Fatal Traffic Accidents, DOT HS 807 094 (Washington, DC: July 1986).

Data are collected from relevant state agencies and electronically submitted for inclusion in the FARs database on a continuous basis. Cross-verification of PARs with death certificates helps prevent undercounting. Moreover, when data are entered, they are checked automatically for acceptable range values and consistency, enabling quick corrections when necessary. Several programs continually monitor the data for completeness and accuracy. Periodically, sample cases are analyzed for accuracy and consistency.

FARS data do not include motor vehicle fatalities on nonpublic roads. These are thought to account for about 2 percent or fewer of the total motor vehicle fatalities per year.

Injuries and crashes: NHTSAs General Estimates System (GES) data are a nationally representative sample of police-reported crashes that contributed to an injury or fatality or resulted in property damage and involved at least one motor vehicle traveling on a trafficway. GES data collectors randomly sample PARs and forward copies to a central contractor for coding into a standard GES system format. Documents such as police diagrams or supporting text provided by the officers might be further reviewed to complete a data entry. A NHTSA study of injuries from motor vehicle crashes estimated the total count of nonfatal injuries at over 5 million compared with the GESs estimate of 3.2 million in 1998.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis

Print source: USDOT, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Facts. Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov

International visitors data

Data on international visitors to the United States are based on international arrivals by air to the United States (excluding those from Canada and Mexico). Information is derived from the Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) Visitor Arrivals Program (I-94) and the U.S. Department of Commerce, Tourism Industries Offices Survey of International Air Travelers. The survey obtains data on overseas travel patterns, characteristics, and spending patterns of international travelers to and from the United States. Between 69,000 and 95,000 travelers are surveyed each year. The survey results are weighted so they represent the international travel populations of U.S. residents and non-residents based upon Immigration and Naturalization Service data.

Additional information:

Contact: U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC), International Trade Administration, Tourism Industries Office

Print source: USDOC, International Trade Administration, Tourism Industries Office, Overseas Visitors to Select U.S. States and Territories. Washington, DC: Annual issues; and USDOC, International Trade Administration, Tourism Industries Office, Overseas Visitors to Select U.S. Cities/Hawaiian Islands. Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://tinet.ita.doc.gov/

Passenger border crossing data

U.S. Custom Service personnel collect passenger border-crossing entry data for all U.S. land, air, and maritime ports. These numbers reflect all entries, and it is not possible to divide these data into separate entries for same-day and overnight travel or by country of residence for the traveler. Additionally, for border-crossing figures, the total number of people is not the number of unique individuals, but rather indicates the number of border crossings. Multiple crossings by the same individual count as multiple border crossings.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Transportation Analysis

Internet: http://www.bts.gov

Railroad industry and shipments data

The Association of American Railroads (AAR) database aggregates data from several sources concerning the freight railroad industry and movement of freight, both nationally and statewide. The state-specific data include commerce, employment, and financial contributions.

The primary source of data for Class I railroads is Schedule 700 of the R-1 Annual Report to the Surface Transportation Board (STB) by individual carriers (100 percent reporting) and the 2000 Carload Waybill Sample. The primary source of data for non-Class I railroads is AARs Profiles of U.S. Railroads from statistics supplied annually by nearly all operating U.S. freight railroads. Some of the data are estimated based on more aggregated, national figures.

The STB defines Class I railroads as having operating revenues at or above a threshold indexed to a base of $250 million (1991) and adjusted annually in concert with changes in the Railroad Freight Rate Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Declassification from Class I status occurs when a railroad falls below the applicable threshold for three consecutive years. Although few in number, Class I railroads account for over 90 percent of the industrys revenue.

The AAR determines the number of non-Class I railroads through an annual survey sent to each U.S. freight railroad.

Historical reliability may vary due to changes in the railroad industry, including bankruptcies, mergers, and declassification by the STB. Small data errors may also have occurred because of independent rounding in this series by the AAR.

Additional information:

Contact: Association of American Railroads, Policy and Economics Department

Internet: http://www.aar.org

Railroad safety data

Railroads are required to file a report for each accident or incident to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). These include: 1) train accidents, reported on Form F 6180.54, comprised of collisions, derailments, and other events involving the operation of on-track equipment and causing reportable damage above an established threshold ($6,600 in 1998); 2) highway-rail grade crossing incidents, reported on Form F 6180.57, involving impact between railroad on-track equipment and highway users at crossings; and 3) other incidents, reported on Form F 6180.55a, involving all other reportable incidents or exposures that cause a fatality or injury to any person or an occupational illness to a railroad employee.

Railroads are required by FRA regulations to use the current FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports when preparing reports.

The Systems Support Division of FRA maintains the Railroad Accident/Incident Reporting System (RAIRS), consisting of four databases: rail equipment, injury/illness, grade-crossing accidents, and railroad summary (freight and passenger). These databases include information on all railroad accidents, grade-crossing accidents, railroad employee casualties, and any other injuries on railroad property, and provide the basis for accident analyses and assessment as well as annual reports. The databases are updated monthly from information submitted by the railroads.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Safety

Print publication: USDOT, Federal Railroad Administration, Railroad Safety Statistics. Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.fra.dot.gov

Recreational boating safety and vehicles data

The U.S. Coast Guard, of the U.S. Department of Transportation, collects data on recreational boating accidents from two sources: 1) Boating Accident Report (BAR) data forwarded to the Coast Guard by jurisdictions with an approved boat numbering and casualty reporting system, and 2) reports of Coast Guard investigations of fatal boating accidents that occurred on waters under federal jurisdiction. Recreational Boating Accident Investigation data are used if submitted to the Coast Guard and are relied on as much as possible to provide accident statistics. In the absence of investigations, information is collected from reports filed by boat operators.

Boat operators are required to file a BAR if an accident results in 1) loss of life, 2) personal injury that requires medical treatment beyond first aid, 3) damage to the vessel and other property exceeding $500, or 4) complete loss of the vessel.

Boat operators are required to report their accidents to authorities in the state where the accident occurred. States with approved boat numbering systems furnish the Coast Guard with BAR data. The minimum reporting requirements are set by federal regulation, but states are allowed to have stricter requirements. The Coast Guard reports recreational boating safety data in the report Boating Statistics, which only covers accidents meeting the federal minimum reporting requirements.

The statistics in Boating Statistics cover boating accidents reported on waters of joint federal and state jurisdiction, and exclusive state jurisdiction.

The Coast Guard believes over 90 percent of fatal accidents are included in Boating Statistics. A smaller percentage of nonfatal accidents are reported because of reporting thresholds, ignorance of the law, and difficulties enforcing the law. Federal law does not require the reporting of accidents on private waters where states have no jurisdiction. Reports of accidents on such waters are included when received by the Coast Guard if they satisfy the other requirements of inclusion. Accidents excluded are those in which the boat was used as a platform for other activities (e.g., swimming), and those in which a person dies of natural causes aboard a boat. However, the data do include accidents involving people in the water who are struck by their boat or another boat.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Boating Safety

Print source: USDOT, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Boating Safety, Boating Statistics, Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.uscgboating.org

Transborder surface freight data

The Transborder Surface Freight Dataset is extracted from the Census Foreign Trade Statistics Program and made available by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Import and export data are extracted from administrative records required by the Departments of Commerce and Treasury. This dataset incorporates all shipments entering or exiting the United States by surface modes of transport (that is, other than air or maritime vessel) to and from Canada or Mexico. Prior to January 1997, this dataset also included transhipments in its detailed tables, that is, shipments entering or exiting the United States by way of U.S. Customs ports on the northern or southern borders, even when the actual origin or final destination of the goods was other than Canada or Mexico. Shipments that neither originate nor terminate in the United States (i.e., intransit shipments) are beyond the scope of this dataset because they are not considered U.S. international trade shipments.

Users should be aware that the trade data fields (such as value and commodity classification) are typically more rigorously reviewed than transportation data fields (i.e., mode of transportation and port of entry/exit). Users should also be aware that the use of foreign trade data to describe physical transportation flows might not be direct. For example, this dataset provides surface transportation information for individual Customs districts and ports on the northern and southern borders. However, because of filing procedures for trade documents, these ports may or may not reflect where goods physically crossed the border. This is because the filer of information may choose to file trade documents at one port, while shipments actually enter or exit at another port.

Import data are generally more accurate than export data. This is primarily due to the fact that Customs uses import documents for enforcement purposes, while it performs no similar function for exports.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Transportation Analysis

Internet: http://www.bts.gov

Transit operating, financial, and safety data

Transit data are from the National Transit Database (NTD) produced by the USDOT, Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Data are collected from transit agencies that receive Urbanized Area Formula Program funds. Transit operators that do not report to FTA are those that do not receive federal funding, typically private, small, and rural operators. FTA reviews and validates information submitted by individual transit agencies. Reliability may vary because some transit agencies cannot obtain accurate information or may interpret certain data definitions differently than intended.

In 2000, 592 agencies reported to the NTD. Of that total, 67 transit agencies received exemptions from detailed reporting because they operated 9 or fewer vehicles, and 7 were excluded because their data were incomplete. Thus, 518 individual reporters were included in the NTD accounting for 90 to 95 percent of transit passenger-miles.

Data are collected on a range of variables including capital and operating funding, transit service supplied and consumed, and transit safety and security. Transit operators must report fatalities, injuries, accidents, incidents, and property damage in excess of $1,000.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Federal Transit Administration

Print source: USDOT, Federal Transit Administration, Data Tables. Washington, DC: Annual issues; and USDOT, Federal Transit Administration, National Transit Database Reporting Manual. Washington, DC: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.fta.dot.gov

Transportation establishment, employees, and payroll data

Data on employees, establishments, and payroll are taken from County Business Patterns, a database of employment in the United States using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Data are collected annually. Data are extracted from the Business Register, the Census Bureaus file of all known single and multi-establishment companies. The Annual Company Organization Survey and quinquennial Economic Censuses provide individual establishment data for multi-location firms. Data for single-location firms are obtained from various programs conducted by the Census Bureau, such as the Economic Censuses, the Annual Survey of Manufactures, and Current Business Surveys. They are also obtained from administrative records of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Social Security Administration (SSA), and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Additional information:

Contact: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, Economic Planning and Coordination Division

Print source: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, [State]: County Business Patterns 1999. CBP/99-6. Washington, DC: 2001.

Internet: http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html

Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey

The Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey (VIUS) collects data on the physical and operational characteristics of private and commercial trucks in the United States. The 1997 VIUS sampled about 131,000 trucks from an estimated universe of over 75 million trucks. The sample excludes vehicles owned by federal, state, and local government including ambulances, buses, motor homes, farm tractors, unpowered trailer units, and trucks reported to have been sold, junked, or wrecked prior to July 1, 1996. Light trucks registered as cars, as is the practice in many states, were included. Unregistered trucks used off-road are not included. Census delivered a mail-out/mail-back survey to the owner identified in the vehicle registration records. Data collection is staggered as state records become available. Owners report data only for the vehicles selected. The response rate for the 1997 VIUS was about 85 percent.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, Service Sector Statistics Division

Print source: USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, [state]: 1997 Vehicle Inventory and Use Survey. EC97TV-[state]. Washington, DC: 1999.

Internet: http://www.census.gov/svsd/www/tiusview.html

Waterborne imports and vessel data

The U.S. Department of Transportations Maritime Administration (MARAD) classifies merchant-based vessels by size and type and reports this information in its annual publication, Merchant Fleets of the World. MARAD compiles these figures from a data service provided by Lloyds Maritime Information Service. The parent company, Lloyds Register (LR), collects data from several sources, including its offices around the world, data transfers and agreements with other classification societies, questionnaires to ship owners and shipbuilders, feedback from government agencies, and input from port agents.

MARADs Office of Statistical and Economic Analysis maintains the waterborne databank used to compile the annual import and export statistics from monthly and quarterly data provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. MARAD publishes the data in reports of vessel movements, trade and cargo by type of service, U.S. and foreign port, country of origin/destination, commodity, value, weight, and containerized cargo.

MARAD distributes the reports and performs special tabulations and customized maritime data reports created for other government agencies and the private sector on a reimbursable basis. MARAD also provides these services for historic data and maintains the Schedule K Classification of Foreign Ports by Geographic Trade Area and Country.

Additional information:

Contact: USDOT, Maritime Administration, Office of Statistical and Economic Analysis

Print source: USDOT, Maritime Administration, Merchant Fleets of the World.

Internet: http://www.marad.dot.gov

Waterborne shipments data

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Navigation Data Center (NDC) collects data on waterborne commodity and vessel movements, domestic commercial vessel characteristics, port and waterway facilities, and navigation dredging projects.

The NDCs databases contain information on physical characteristics, infrastructure, and commodities for principal facilities on the U.S. coast, Great Lakes, and inland ports. The data consists of listings of port areas waterfront facilities, including information on berthing, cranes, transit sheds, grain elevators, marine repair plants, fleeting areas, and docking and storage facilities.

All vessel operators of record report their domestic waterborne traffic movements to the Corps via ENG Forms 3925 and 3925b. Cargo movements are reported according to points of loading and unloading. Excluded cargo movements are: 1) cargo carried on general ferries, 2) coal and petroleum products loaded from shore facilities directly into vessels for fuel use, 3) military cargo moved in U.S. Department of Defense vessels, and 4) cargo weighing less than 100 tons moved on government equipment. The Corps calculates ton-miles by multiplying the cargos tonnage by the distance between points of loading and unloading.

An annual survey of companies that operate inland waterway vessels is the principal source of data for inland non self-propelled vessels, self-propelled vessels, and flag passenger and cargo vessels. More than 3,000 surveys are sent to these companies, and response rates are typically above 90 percent.

Additional information:

Contact: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center

Print source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterborne Commerce of the United States. New Orleans, LA: Annual issues.

Internet: http://www.wrsc.usace.army.mil