Table 1-4: Nebraska Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-4: Nebraska Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 437 437 437 436 438 437
Very good 11 166 172 95 175 215
Good 66 72 81 139 107 72
Fair 81 96 53 57 75 39
Mediocre 225 103 112 120 72 78
Poor 54 0 19 25 9 33
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 2,745 2,716 2,725 2,715 2,713 2,712
Very good 36 655 724 520 602 581
Good 627 911 913 946 862 1,046
Fair 1,505 857 847 941 981 901
Mediocre 402 238 190 260 230 143
Poor 175 55 51 48 38 41
Not reported 0 13 0 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 4,181 4,198 4,199 3,888 4,112 4,213
Very good 106 692 1,022 565 993 1,013
Good 755 1,380 1,475 1,589 1,546 1,507
Fair 2,489 1,578 1,298 1,140 1,095 1,268
Mediocre 517 363 265 363 233 273
Poor 314 185 139 231 245 152
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 3,127
Very good N N N N N 415
Good N N N N N 627
Fair N N N N N 280
Mediocre N N N N N 1,218
Poor N N N N N 587
Not reported N N N N N 0

KEY: N = Data do not exist.

NOTE:In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Servicability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.