Table 1-5: Nebraska Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-5: Nebraska Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 43 43 45 45 44 44
Very good 0 8 10 2 2 5
Good 5 13 15 18 19 16
Fair 11 8 6 7 15 6
Mediocre 15 13 9 13 6 13
Poor 12 1 5 5 2 4
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 17 17 17 18 18 17
Very good 0 0 0 0 0 0
Good 3 1 1 1 1 1
Fair 13 16 16 16 14 15
Mediocre 5 0 0 1 3 1
Poor 1 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 301 272 316 212 310 310
Very good 0 7 25 8 12 11
Good 10 32 36 29 26 25
Fair 102 99 114 17 120 127
Mediocre 78 67 68 82 77 83
Poor 111 67 73 76 75 64
Not reported 116 147 102 103 104 104
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N 37
Very good N N N N N 13
Good N N N N N 3
Fair N N N N N 2
Mediocre N N N N N 8
Poor N N N N N 11
Not reported N N N N N 0
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N N
Very good N N N N N N
Good N N N N N N
Fair N N N N N N
Mediocre N N N N N N
Poor N N N N N N
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = Data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Servicability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.