Table 1-4: Nevada Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-4: Nevada Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 413 480 478 480 479 479
Very good 216 198 227 228 126 132
Good 151 152 142 145 265 260
Fair 20 48 44 42 48 47
Mediocre 26 64 36 36 31 31
Poor 0 18 29 29 9 9
Not reported 67 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 1,312 1,389 1,390 1,388 1,370 1,377
Very good 316 173 164 164 131 139
Good 418 533 571 606 608 622
Fair 578 615 630 593 606 591
Mediocre 0 61 23 23 25 25
Poor 0 7 2 2 0 0
Not reported 80 0 0 0 18 19
Minor arterial (total reported) 692 715 731 725 725 718
Very good 169 122 94 93 96 95
Good 144 174 190 281 284 278
Fair 376 358 443 347 334 334
Mediocre 3 56 4 4 11 11
Poor 0 5 0 0 0 0
Not reported 23 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 2,139
Very good N N N N N 42
Good N N N N N 576
Fair N N N N N 1,010
Mediocre N N N N N 412
Poor N N N N N 99
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.