Table 1-5: Ohio Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: Ohio Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 830 830 830 830 829 830
Very good 265 208 218 328 293 361
Good 435 468 477 427 421 368
Fair 97 129 101 55 95 86
Mediocre 33 25 34 20 18 15
Poor 0 0 0 0 2 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 2,219 2,216 2,229 2,226 2,221 2,232
Very good 303 277 222 394 298 373
Good 1,500 1,465 1,522 1,431 1,408 1,397
Fair 379 437 464 383 492 443
Mediocre 33 30 18 14 16 16
Poor 4 7 3 4 7 3
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 2,833 2,842 2,828 2,830 2,829 2,830
Very good 568 290 317 420 171 140
Good 1,594 2,034 1,873 1,841 1,799 1,959
Fair 608 447 570 559 785 701
Mediocre 63 71 39 0 62 30
Poor 0 0 29 10 12 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) 0 0 0 0 0 8,942
Very good N N N N N 715
Good N N N N N 5,302
Fair N N N N N 2,762
Mediocre N N N N N 106
Poor N N N N N 57
Not reported N N N N N N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.