Table 1-5: West Virginia Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: West Virginia Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 459 459 458 455 456 455
Very good 54 66 53 78 47 33
Good 133 136 219 214 246 259
Fair 84 80 79 69 57 57
Mediocre 153 144 101 89 81 81
Poor 35 33 6 5 25 25
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other principal arterial (total reported) 1,052 1,052 949 1,081 1,080 1,081
Very good 75 103 77 153 102 94
Good 362 353 435 428 397 405
Fair 559 545 418 474 539 540
Mediocre 48 44 12 18 38 38
Poor 8 7 7 8 4 4
Not reported 0 0 104 0 0 0
Minor arterial (total reported) 1,565 1,564 1,500 1,533 1,534 1,534
Very good 14 130 19 251 59 55
Good 486 550 415 402 381 387
Fair 886 761 1,008 830 921 923
Mediocre 105 89 58 50 110 113
Poor 74 34 0 0 63 56
Not reported 0 0 63 0 0 0
Major collector (total reported) N N N N N 5,970
Very good N N N N N 0
Good N N N N N 686
Fair N N N N N 2,917
Mediocre N N N N N 1,378
Poor N N N N N 989
Not reported N N N N N 0

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.