Table 1-5: Wisconsin Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

Table 1-5: Wisconsin Road Condition by Functional System -- Urban

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Interstate (total reported) 149 170 172 169 176 158
Very good 8 2 9 5 15 21
Good 13 34 23 23 55 63
Fair 67 41 33 35 34 41
Mediocre 45 74 88 86 63 33
Poor 16 19 19 20 5 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 4 4
Other freeways and expressways (total reported) 191 178 178 176 173 179
Very good 13 11 9 5 6 8
Good 47 34 29 27 29 56
Fair 111 104 110 104 103 94
Mediocre 14 25 24 31 27 16
Poor 6 4 6 9 8 5
Not reported 0 1 0 0 0 1
Other principal arterial (total reported) 1,321 1,236 1,318 1,317 1,323 1,318
Very good 22 7 24 4 13 28
Good 171 125 119 91 100 155
Fair 620 575 592 566 566 603
Mediocre 298 297 316 320 321 305
Poor 210 232 267 336 323 227
Not reported 0 75 1 1 2 4
Urban minor arterial (total reported) N N N N N 2,023
Very good N N N N N 106
Good N N N N N 469
Fair N N N N N 1,183
Mediocre N N N N N 171
Poor N N N N N 94
Not reported N N N N N 0
Urban collector (total reported) N N N N N 1,513
Very good N N N N N 15
Good N N N N N 252
Fair N N N N N 855
Mediocre N N N N N 241
Poor N N N N N 150
Not reported N N N N N 0

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for urban minor arterials and urban collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.